§

MV Transit and/or MV Transportation, Inc.

16-CA-110465 (N.L.R.B. Jan. 9, 2019)
MV Transit and/or MV Transportation, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    482 U.S. 27 (1987)   Cited 372 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 480 times   50 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  3. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  4. Creative Vision Res., L.L.C. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    882 F.3d 510 (5th Cir. 2018)   Cited 9 times
    Observing that the court's review is not "pro forma " or "merely a ‘rubber stamp’ "

  5. Mike-Sell's Potato Chip Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    807 F.3d 318 (D.C. Cir. 2015)   Cited 4 times

    Nos. 14–1021 14–1031. 12-11-2015 MIKE–SELL'S POTATO CHIP COMPANY, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. Jennifer R. Asbrock argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs was Eric S. Clark. Micah P.S. Jost, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Richard F. Griffin, Jr., General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Elizabeth A. Heaney, Supervisory

  6. Staffco of Brooklyn, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    888 F.3d 1297 (D.C. Cir. 2018)   Cited 2 times

    No. 16-1311 C/w 16-1363 05-04-2018 STAFFCO OF BROOKLYN, LLC, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent New York State Nurses Association, Intervenor Nicholas M. Reiter, New York, NY, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Benjamin E. Stockman, New York, NY. Moxila A. Upadhyaya, Washington, DC, entered an appearance. Jared D. Cantor, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Richard F. Griffin, General

  7. Canteen Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    103 F.3d 1355 (7th Cir. 1997)   Cited 18 times
    Affirming NLRB's finding of substantial continuity where there was no temporal break in the operation of the two businesses

  8. Leach Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    54 F.3d 802 (D.C. Cir. 1995)   Cited 4 times

    No. 93-1707. Argued March 24, 1995. Decided May 12, 1995. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. William H. Emer, Los Angeles, CA, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Kelly F. Watson, Los Angeles, CA. Robert J. Englehart, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, DC, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Linda R. Sher, Acting Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General