13 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Mackay Co.
304 U.S. 333 (1938) Cited 535 times 4 Legal AnalysesHolding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices
Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.
370 U.S. 9 (1962) Cited 206 times 3 Legal AnalysesHolding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Whitin Mach. Works
204 F.2d 883 (1st Cir. 1953) Cited 57 timesIn National Labor Relations Board v. Whitin Machine Works, 204 F.2d 883 (1st Cir.1953), for example, an assistant supervisor in his employer's accounting department was, upon a consideration of the nature of his work, determined not to be a supervisor for purposes of litigating his discharge from employment, and, therefore, he was entitled to the protections of the National Labor Relations Act. 204 F.2d at 886.
Joanna Cotton Mills v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
176 F.2d 749 (4th Cir. 1949) Cited 60 timesHolding that circulation of a petition by an employee for the removal of a foreman against whom the employee held a personal grudge was not protected activity
Cusano v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
190 F.2d 898 (3d Cir. 1951) Cited 35 timesNo. 10404. Argued May 22, 1951. Filed August 16, 1951. Samuel J. Davidson, Hoboken, N.J. (DeFazio, Davidson DeFazio, Hoboken, N.J., on the brief), for petitioners. Arnold Ordman, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Mark C. Curran, Washington, D.C., Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, on the brief), for respondent. Before GOODRICH, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. STALEY, Circuit Judge. This case is
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wallick
198 F.2d 477 (3d Cir. 1952) Cited 27 timesIn N.L.R.B. v. Wallick, 198 F.2d 477 (3 Cir. 1952), that court sustained a Board order requiring a respondent partnership which operated several enterprises engaged in the manufacture of ladies' garments to either reopen a plant which it had closed in violation of the Act because its employees had organized or give its employees an opportunity to work in other plants operated by the partnership.
Salt River Val. W. Users' v. N.L.R.B
206 F.2d 325 (9th Cir. 1953) Cited 24 timesNo. 13456. July 23, 1953. Jennings, Strouss, Salmon Trask, Irving A. Jennings, Richard G. Kleindienst, Phoenix, Ariz., for petitioner. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, NLRB, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Dominick L. Manoli, Thomas F. Maher, Attys., NLRB, Washington, D.C., Charles Hackler, Atty., NLRB, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before MATHEWS, BONE and ORR, Circuit Judges. ORR, Circuit Judge. The Salt River Valley Water Users' Association
National Labor Rel. Board v. Nu-Car Carriers
189 F.2d 756 (3d Cir. 1951) Cited 26 timesIn N.L.R.B. v. Nu-Car Carriers, Inc., 189 F.2d 756 (3rd Cir. 1951), cert. den., 342 U.S. 919, 72 S.Ct. 367, 96 L.Ed. 687 (1952), workers who leased tractors from a corporation were held to be employees, on the grounds that express contractual provisions placing the workers under the direction and supervision of the corporation were enforced by supervisors who checked up on the quality of their driving, discharged, and at times assigned routes to the workers.
National Labor Rel. Board v. Kennametal, Inc.
182 F.2d 817 (3d Cir. 1950) Cited 26 timesNo. 10113. Argued May 5, 1950. May 24, 1950. Mozart G. Ratner, Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Thomas McDermott, National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. William B. Paul, Pittsburgh, Pa. (John C. Hill, Paul, Lawrence Wills, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for respondent. Before MARIS, GOODRICH and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. GOODRICH, Circuit Judge. This petition for enforcement of an order