§

MURTIS TAYLOR HUMAN SERVICES SYSTEM

360 N.L.R.B. 546 (N.L.R.B. 2014)
MURTIS TAYLOR HUMAN SERVICES SYSTEM

13 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.

    420 U.S. 251 (1975)   Cited 434 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. Dorsey Trailers, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    233 F.3d 831 (4th Cir. 2000)   Cited 21 times
    Holding that as long as employer decision requires capital expenditure, decision is outside duty to bargain

  6. Consolidated Diesel Co. v. N.L.R.B

    263 F.3d 345 (4th Cir. 2001)   Cited 15 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that "[t]here would be nothing left of [the Act's] rights if every time employees exercised them in a way that was somehow offensive to someone," they were subject to the threat of discipline

  7. Dunkin' Donuts Mid-Atlantic v. N.L.R.B

    363 F.3d 437 (D.C. Cir. 2004)   Cited 10 times
    Enforcing In re Aldworth Co., 338 NLRB 137

  8. N.L.R.B. v. American Dir. Boring

    383 F. App'x 594 (8th Cir. 2010)   Cited 1 times

    No. 09-1194. Submitted: December 17, 2009. Filed: June 24, 2010. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Linda Dreeben, Assistant General Counsel, Kellie Isbell, Meredith Jason, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, Ralph P. Tremain, National Labor Relations Board, St. Louis, MO, for Petitioner. Christopher Grant, Schuchat Cook, St. Louis, MO, for Intervenor. Bryan M. Kaemmerer, Michael E. Kaemmerer, McCarthy Leonard, Chester-field, MO, for Respondent

  9. LB B v. N.L.R.B

    232 F. App'x 270 (4th Cir. 2007)

    Nos. 06-1537, 06-1583, 06-1673. Argued: March 13, 2007. Decided: May 11, 2007. On Petitions for Review and Cross-application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. (29-CA-25511; 29-CA-25668; 29-CA-25762; 29-CA-25777; 29-CA-25779). ARGUED: Jennifer McDougal Miller, Wyrick, Robbins, Yates Ponton, Raleigh, North Carolina, for LB B Associates, Incorporated. Philip Adam Hostak, National Labor Relations Board, Office of the General Counsel, Washington, D.C., for the Board. Marty

  10. N.L.R.B. v. American Linen Supply Co.

    945 F.2d 1428 (8th Cir. 1991)   Cited 12 times

    No. 90-1467. Submitted December 13, 1990. Decided October 4, 1991. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied December 4, 1991. Frederick Havard, Washington, D.C., argued (Jerry M. Hunter, Robert E. Allen and Aileen A. Armstrong, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. William Harding, Lincoln, Neb., argued (Jack L. Shultz and Jerry L. Pigsley, Lincoln, Neb., and Cecil R. Hedger, Denver, Colo., on brief), for respondent. Petition for enforcement of order from National Labor Relations Board. Before