§

Multi-Hydromatic Welding and Manufacturing Co.

113 N.L.R.B. 755 (N.L.R.B. 1955)
Multi-Hydromatic Welding and Manufacturing Co.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co.

    344 U.S. 344 (1953)   Cited 368 times
    Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding

  2. Virginia Electric Co. v. Board

    319 U.S. 533 (1943)   Cited 326 times
    Stating that the purpose of the Act is to encourage and protect "full freedom of association for workers"

  3. Republic Steel Corp. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 7 (1940)   Cited 231 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Republic Steel, supra, the Court refused to enforce an order requiring the employer to pay the full amount of back pay to an employee who had been paid to work for the Work Projects Administration in the meantime.

  4. F.T.C. v. Motion Picture Adv. Co.

    344 U.S. 392 (1953)   Cited 110 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that evidence sustained the Commission's finding that the distributor's exclusive screening agreements with theater operators unreasonably restrained competition, but stating that the Commission had found that the term of one-year exclusive contracts had become a standard practice and would not be an undue restraint on competition

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Remington Rand, Inc.

    94 F.2d 862 (2d Cir. 1938)   Cited 178 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 869, the Board had ordered the employer to deal exclusively with a joint board which had brought the unfair labor practice charges involved in that case.

  6. Republic Steel Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    107 F.2d 472 (3d Cir. 1939)   Cited 59 times
    In Republic Steel Corp. v. NLRB, 107 F.2d 472 (3d Cir. 1939), modified on other grounds, 311 U.S. 7, 61 S.Ct. 77, 85 L.Ed. 6 (1940), this court stated that Congress must have contemplated that the protection of the National Labor Relations Act would extend to employees who commit minor acts of misconduct while exercising their right to strike.

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Kingston Cake Co.

    191 F.2d 563 (3d Cir. 1951)   Cited 21 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Kingston Cake Co., 3 Cir., 191 F.2d 563, 567, the court said: "The purpose of the charge is to give the Board a preliminary basis for determining whether to proceed in the investigation of the case.

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Kingston Cake Co.

    206 F.2d 604 (3d Cir. 1953)   Cited 17 times

    No. 10932. Argued March 3, 1953. Decided July 17, 1953. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Mark C. Curran, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Max Rosenn, Wilkes-Barre, Pa. (Harold Rosenn, and Solomon Lubin, Wilkes-Barre, Pa., on the brief), for Kingston Cake Co., Inc. R. Lawrence Coughlin, Albert N. Danoff, Wilkes-Barre, Pa., for

  9. Nat. Lab. Rel. Bd. v. Globe Automatic Sprinkler

    199 F.2d 64 (3d Cir. 1952)   Cited 17 times

    No. 10718. Argued June 3, 1952. Decided September 30, 1952. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen., Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Mary Williamson, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for appellant. Richard C. Bull, Philadelphia, Pa. (White, Williams Scott, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for respondent. Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges. KALODNER

  10. National Labor Rel. Board v. Dorsey Trailers

    179 F.2d 589 (5th Cir. 1950)   Cited 17 times

    No. 12750. January 30, 1950. T. Lowry Whittaker, Chief Legal Officer, National Labor Relations Bd., Atlanta, Ga., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Bd., Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Bd., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Bentley G. Byrnes, New Orleans, La., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and McCORD, Circuit Judges. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. Based upon findings that respondent had engaged, and