§

Mullins Broadcasting Co.

200 N.L.R.B. 119 (N.L.R.B. 1972)
Mullins Broadcasting Co.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 322 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fleetwood Trailer Co.

    389 U.S. 375 (1967)   Cited 233 times
    In Fleetwood Trailer, 389 U.S. 375, 88 S.Ct. 543, the Supreme Court was required to determine whether the employer violated the Act when it hired six new employees who had not previously worked for the company instead of six former strikers who had applied for reinstatement.

  3. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"

  4. N.L.R.B. v. George J. Roberts Sons, Inc.

    451 F.2d 941 (2d Cir. 1971)   Cited 15 times

    No. 135, Docket 71-1477. Argued October 18, 1971. Decided November 16, 1971. Steven C. Kahn, Atty., Eugene G. Goslee, Acting Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliot Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. David D. Wach, Rockville Centre, N.Y. (Siben Siben, Bay Shore, N.Y., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before MEDINA, MANSFIELD and MULLIGAN, Circuit Judges. MULLIGAN

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Hudson Transit Lines, Inc.

    429 F.2d 1223 (3d Cir. 1970)   Cited 8 times

    No. 17999. Argued April 9, 1970. Decided July 20, 1970. William J. Avrutis, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Peter Ames Eveleth, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. James H. Yauch, Jr., Yauch Fagan, Newark, N.J. (James F.X. O'Brien, Associate Counsel, Newark, N.J., on the brief), for respondent. Before SEITZ and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges, and LATCHUM, District Judge. OPINION