§

M.U. Industries, Inc.

284 N.L.R.B. 388 (N.L.R.B. 1987)
M.U. Industries, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Jeffries Lithograph Co.

    752 F.2d 459 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 49 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding continuity where successor retained essentially same workforce in same plant doing same jobs under same supervisor with some of the same equipment, providing similar services

  2. Premium Foods, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    709 F.2d 623 (9th Cir. 1983)   Cited 32 times
    Holding that employees' requests for withdrawal cards, even if such requests indicated that the employees no longer wished to be members of the union, did “not necessarily indicate that [they] no longer wish to be represented by it”

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Hudson River Aggregates

    639 F.2d 865 (2d Cir. 1981)   Cited 26 times
    Holding that the NLRB's bargaining unit determinations are rarely to be disturbed unless arbitrary, unreasonable, or not supported by substantial evidence.

  4. Pacific Hide Fur Depot, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    553 F.2d 609 (9th Cir. 1977)   Cited 16 times
    In Pacific Hide Fur Depot, Inc., 553 F.2d at 610, 611, the employer reached a full complement in less than sixty days. During that time the complement expanded steadily as planned, from seven at the beginning of operations to nineteen, just one more than the complement of the predecessor when it ceased operations.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Fall River Dyeing Finishing Corp.

    775 F.2d 425 (1st Cir. 1985)   Cited 7 times

    No. 85-1019. Argued June 6, 1985. Decided October 18, 1985. Ira Drogin, New York City, with whom Leaf, Sternklar Drogin, New York City, was on brief for respondent. William M. Bernstein, Washington, D.C., with whom Elinor Hadley Stillman, Rosemary M. Collyer, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on brief for petitioner. Petition from the National Labor Relations Board

  6. Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. U.S.

    775 F.2d 459 (2d Cir. 1985)   Cited 6 times
    Examining whether gender-based mortality tables used in calculating an estate's tax obligations were "invidious" by examining their " aggregate impact on class; demeaning generalizations; stereotyped assumptions; and flawed use of statistics"

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Daneker Clock Company, Inc.

    516 F.2d 315 (4th Cir. 1975)   Cited 6 times

    No. 74-2097. Submitted April 11, 1975. Decided May 12, 1975. Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and John D. Burgoyne and Corinna Lothar Metcalf, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, for petitioner. Charles E. Chlan, Towson, Md., for respondent. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before ALDRICH, BUTZNER and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges. Senior Circuit Judge of the First Circuit