Mt. Clemens General Hospital

19 Cited authorities

Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board
379 U.S. 203 (1964) Cited 734 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA
Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
460 U.S. 693 (1983) Cited 314 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights
Detroit Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
440 U.S. 301 (1979) Cited 228 times 20 Legal Analyses
Holding that a union's request for employee aptitude tests was relevant to its claim, but employer's interest in preserving confidentiality was also legitimate, and disclosing the information only upon the employee's written consent was a reasonable accommodation
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.
385 U.S. 432 (1967) Cited 265 times 4 Legal Analyses
Approving "discovery-type standard"
Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers Local Union No. 6-418 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
711 F.2d 348 (D.C. Cir. 1983) Cited 41 times
Nos. 82-1418 to 82-1420, 82-1743, 82-1589 and 82-1940. Argued May 5, 1983. Decided June 30, 1983. George H. Cohen, with whom Laurence Gold, Washington, D.C., was on brief, for petitioners, Oil, Chemical and Atomic Workers, Local Union No. 6-418, AFL-CIO, et al. George J. Tichy, II, San Francisco, Cal., with whom Robert K. Carrol, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner, Borden Chemical, A Division of Borden, Inc. Howard A. Crawford, with whom Jack D. Rowe, Kansas City, Mo., was on brief, for petitioner
San Diego Newspaper Guild, Etc. v. N.L.R.B
548 F.2d 863 (9th Cir. 1977) Cited 50 times
Rejecting a union's claim for information when the CBA was not up for renewal for two years and there was no evidence of contract negotiations
Mt. Clemens General Hosp. v. N.L.R.B
328 F.3d 837 (6th Cir. 2003) Cited 12 times 2 Legal Analyses
Noting that there was no evidence that more controversial buttons had caused disturbances
N.L.R.B. v. Pfizer, Inc.
763 F.2d 887 (7th Cir. 1985) Cited 31 times
Holding that an employer's bare assertion that information is confidential does not entitle it to resist production
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Fluor Daniel
161 F.3d 953 (6th Cir. 1998) Cited 12 times
Making distinction between union organizer who will exercise statutory right to organize as opposed to an employee who has merely worked for a union contractor
Curtiss-Wright, Wright Aero. Div. v. N.L.R.B
347 F.2d 61 (3d Cir. 1965) Cited 55 times
Noting the Board has "considerable leeway in amplifying or expanding certain details not specifically set forth in the complaint if they accord with the general substance of the complaint"

Mt. Clemens General Hospital

19 Cited authorities

Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

Holding that a union's request for employee aptitude tests was relevant to its claim, but employer's interest in preserving confidentiality was also legitimate, and disclosing the information only upon the employee's written consent was a reasonable accommodation

Approving "discovery-type standard"

Rejecting a union's claim for information when the CBA was not up for renewal for two years and there was no evidence of contract negotiations

Noting that there was no evidence that more controversial buttons had caused disturbances

Holding that an employer's bare assertion that information is confidential does not entitle it to resist production

Making distinction between union organizer who will exercise statutory right to organize as opposed to an employee who has merely worked for a union contractor

Noting the Board has "considerable leeway in amplifying or expanding certain details not specifically set forth in the complaint if they accord with the general substance of the complaint"