§

MSK Cargo/King Express

348 N.L.R.B. 1096 (N.L.R.B. 2006)
MSK Cargo/King Express

9 Cited authorities

  1. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    482 U.S. 27 (1987)   Cited 369 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  3. Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Exec. Bd., Hotel & Rest. Emps. & Bartenders Int'l Union, AFL-CIO

    417 U.S. 249 (1974)   Cited 366 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding under NLRA that purchaser of hotel assets was not required to arbitrate with union about its decision not to hire all of seller’s employees

  4. Lincoln Park Zoological Society v. Natioanal Labor Relations Board

    116 F.3d 216 (7th Cir. 1997)   Cited 15 times
    Applying the successorship principle in the context of a public to private transition

  5. Prime Service, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    266 F.3d 1233 (D.C. Cir. 2001)   Cited 9 times

    No. 00-1306. Argued September 7, 2001. Decided October 12, 2001. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Harry J. Secaras argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Howard L. Bernstein. Steven B. Goldstein, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong

  6. N.L.R.B. v. DeBartelo

    241 F.3d 207 (2d Cir. 2001)   Cited 8 times
    Holding that substantial continuity "is evaluated principally from the employees' perspective, the crucial question being whether those employees who have been retained will understandably view their job situations as essentially unaltered"

  7. Sierra Realty Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    82 F.3d 494 (D.C. Cir. 1996)   Cited 2 times

    No. 95-1349 Argued March 26, 1996 Decided May 3, 1996 Sidney Orenstein argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner. William A. Baudler, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Linda R. Sher, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Peter D. Winkler, Supervisory Attorney. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board Before:

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Foodway of El Paso

    496 F.2d 117 (5th Cir. 1974)   Cited 17 times
    Acquiring company succeeds to duty to recognize existing union despite 24 distinguishing factors

  9. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,874 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions