§
Motor Convoy

7 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Magnavox Co. of Tennessee

    415 U.S. 322 (1974)   Cited 76 times
    In Magnavox, the Board changed its bifurcated rule and adopted the Eighth Circuit's view that the union had no power to waive employee distribution rights on behalf of either itself or another union.

  2. Local 900, Intern. U. of Elec., v. N.L.R.B

    727 F.2d 1184 (D.C. Cir. 1984)   Cited 61 times
    Holding that party's objection, though somewhat vague, was statutorily sufficient

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Milk Drivers & Dairy Employees, Local 338

    531 F.2d 1162 (2d Cir. 1976)   Cited 38 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Milk Drivers, an 8(a)(3) violation was established where it was found that by becoming a "good" union member, see Radio Officers' Union, supra, 347 U.S. at 40, 74 S.Ct. at 335, an individual had the opportunity to become a shop steward and thus obtain super-seniority.

  4. Ciba-Geigy Pharmaceuticals Div. v. N.L.R.B

    722 F.2d 1120 (3d Cir. 1983)   Cited 17 times
    In Ciba-Geigy Pharmaceuticals Division v. NLRB, 722 F.2d 1120 (3d Cir. 1983), the court rejected an argument that an "extracontractual residual rights" theory allowed imposition of attendance rules.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Intern. Union of Elevator

    902 F.2d 1297 (8th Cir. 1990)   Cited 5 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 88-2354. Submitted May 10, 1989. Decided April 27, 1990. Steven B. Goldstein, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Nicholas R. Femia, Washington, D.C., for respondents. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before JOHN R. GIBSON and MAGILL, Circuit Judges, and HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge. JOHN R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge. Ray Ritz, as a matter of conscience, refused to enter a neutral gate at a construction site and report for work with his employer, Long Elevator and Machine Company, Inc

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Local 1131

    777 F.2d 1131 (6th Cir. 1985)   Cited 7 times
    Noting NLRB practice of refusing to defer to arbitration when contract clause is claimed to be illegal

  7. Bricklayers Stone Masons Union v. N.L.R.B

    562 F.2d 775 (D.C. Cir. 1977)   Cited 8 times
    In Bricklayers, the Board found that the picket line clauses of the bricklayers', laborers', engineers', and plumbers' unions were in violation of section 8(e) of the Act because the clauses were broad enough as written or applied to sanction refusals to cross secondary picket lines, and the clauses were not saved by virtue of the construction industry proviso to section 8(e).