§

Moss Planing Mill Co.

119 N.L.R.B. 1733 (N.L.R.B. 1958)
Moss Planing Mill Co.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 871 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

  2. Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co.

    344 U.S. 344 (1953)   Cited 368 times
    Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding

  3. National Labor Relations Bd. v. S. Silk Mills

    242 F.2d 697 (6th Cir. 1957)   Cited 20 times
    In NLRB v. Southern Silk Mills, Inc., 242 F.2d 697 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 355 U.S. 821, 78 S.Ct. 28, 2 L.Ed. 2d 37 (1957), the court concluded that after a fruitless seven-month search for employment in their trade, striking textile knitters should have sought other jobs for which they were qualified.

  4. National Labor Rel. Board v. Moss Planing Mill

    224 F.2d 702 (4th Cir. 1955)   Cited 17 times
    In Moss Planing Mill, the defendant employer had discriminated against two former employees in violation of the National Labor Relations Act.

  5. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Deena Artware

    228 F.2d 871 (6th Cir. 1955)   Cited 8 times

    No. 11156. December 16, 1955. Geo. J. Bott, Former General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. James G. Wheeler, Paducah, Ky., for respondent. Before MARTIN, MILLER and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This Court having on July 30, 1952, handed down its decision enforcing an order of the National Labor Relations Board, which directed, among other things, that the respondent, Deena Artware, Incorporated, Paducah, Kentucky, its officers, agents, successors and assigns

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Moss Planing Mill

    206 F.2d 557 (4th Cir. 1953)   Cited 9 times

    No. 6605. Argued June 18, 1953. Decided July 24, 1953. John E. Jay, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Whiteford S. Blakeney, Charlotte, N.C., and John A. Wilkinson, Washington, N.C. (Rodman Rodman, Washington, N.C., and Pierce Blakeney, Charlotte, N.C., on brief), for respondent. Before PARKER, Chief

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Pugh & Barr, Inc.

    231 F.2d 558 (4th Cir. 1956)   Cited 5 times

    No. 6369. Argued March 20, 1956. Decided April 9, 1956. Rose Mary Filipowicz, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Arnold Ordman, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for petitioner. W. Paul McWhorter, Clarksburg, W. Va. (John S. Stump, Jr., Clarksburg, W. Va., on the brief), for respondent. Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This is the third time that this