§
Mosher Steel Co.

27 Cited authorities

  1. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 731 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  3. Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Labor Board

    350 U.S. 270 (1956)   Cited 403 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that collective-bargaining agreement "must be read as a whole and in light of the law relating to it when it was made"

  4. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 269 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

  5. Labor Board v. Crompton Mills

    337 U.S. 217 (1949)   Cited 102 times
    Holding unlawful unilateral changes significantly different from "any which the employer has proposed" during bargaining

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Tex-Tan, Inc.

    318 F.2d 472 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 45 times
    In NLRB v. Tex-tan, Inc., 318 F.2d 472, 478 (5th Cir. 1972), the Fifth Circuit found that the union's demand that records be provided in a "organized fashion" was unreasonable and that the company's "unqualified offer" to "see and copy any of its records" met the union's rights to be provided with information.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. SAFWAY STEEL SCAFFOLDS CO. OF GA

    383 F.2d 273 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 34 times
    In NLRB v. Safway Steel Scaffolds Co., 383 F.2d 273 (5th Cir. 1967), we found "there was no showing of a proclivity to violate the Act or certain sections of the Act," id. at 282, where the employer had refused to bargain in good faith by threatening and then enforcing a wage reduction and by firing seven striking employees.

  8. Leeds Northrup Company v. N.L.R.B

    391 F.2d 874 (3d Cir. 1968)   Cited 31 times
    In Leeds Northrup Co. v. NLRB, 391 F.2d 874 (3rd Cir. 1968), the Third Circuit enforced the Board's order requiring the company to grant backpay to union employees based on a prior compensation formula where the company had unilaterally altered the formula in violation of its duty to bargain.

  9. A.H. BELO CORPORATION

    411 F.2d 959 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 28 times
    Deciding that the employer engaged in dilatory tactics in “causing negotiations to drag out over a year ... delay[ing] negotiations two months in order to reply to the union's original proposal, and when it did, counter[ing] with a sketchy four page paper”

  10. International Tel. and Tel. Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    382 F.2d 366 (3d Cir. 1967)   Cited 30 times
    Finding that a mixed unit of professional and non-professional employees, though frowned upon within section 9 of the Act, was still protected by section 8's bargaining requirement