§

Morton Inter-national, Inc. v. Asahi Denka Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha

No. 91114298 (T.T.A.B. Dec. 14, 2001)
Morton Inter-national, Inc. v. Asahi Denka Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha

5 Cited authorities

  1. Park 'N Fly, Inc. v. Dollar Park & Fly, Inc.

    469 U.S. 189 (1985)   Cited 957 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an incontestable mark cannot be challenged as merely descriptive

  2. Jet, Inc. v. Sewage Aeration Systems

    223 F.3d 1360 (Fed. Cir. 2000)   Cited 79 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that the same cause of action can exist in two cases only where the same set of transactional facts are involved in those cases and that, where the transactional facts differ, the doctrine of claim preclusion does not apply

  3. Mothers Restaurant, v. Mama's Pizza, Inc.

    723 F.2d 1566 (Fed. Cir. 1983)   Cited 82 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding collateral estoppel may foreclose relitigation of issues that were "actually litigated" and determined in a prior law suit.

  4. Toro Co. v. Hardigg Industries, Inc.

    549 F.2d 785 (C.C.P.A. 1977)   Cited 13 times
    In Toro Co. v. Hardigg Enterprises, Inc., 549 F.2d 785, 788, 193 USPQ 149, 153 (CCPA 1977), this court reiterated the basic rule that appellate jurisdiction does not extend to decisions of the board which are not final.

  5. Section 1064 - Cancellation of registration

    15 U.S.C. § 1064   Cited 923 times   51 Legal Analyses
    Allowing a petition to cancel a certification mark if the registered owner "discriminately refuses to certify" qualifying goods or services