§

Morris Digital Works, LLC

No. 78730590 (T.T.A.B. Dec. 3, 2007)
Morris Digital Works, LLC

4 Cited authorities

  1. Application of Abcor Development Corp.

    588 F.2d 811 (C.C.P.A. 1978)   Cited 36 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Abcor, the question before the court was whether applicant's alleged mark (GASBADGE) was "merely descriptive" within the meaning of § 2(e)(1) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(e)(1).

  2. Cummins Engine Co. v. Continental Motors

    359 F.2d 892 (C.C.P.A. 1966)   Cited 12 times
    Rejecting challenge to standing even though petitioner "was not using the term as a trademark nor did it co[n]template doing so," and concluding that "[a]ppellee as a competitor of appellant clearly has reason to believe it will be damaged to the extent required by statute"

  3. Application of Allen Electric Equip. Co.

    458 F.2d 1404 (C.C.P.A. 1972)   Cited 1 times

    Patent Appeal No. 8721. May 18, 1972. Albert L. Ely, Jr., Cleveland, Ohio (Ely, Golrick Flynn), Cleveland, Ohio, attorneys of record, for appellant. S. Wm. Cochran, Washington, D.C., for the Commissioner of Patents. Jere W. Sears, Washington, D.C., A.D. Hooks, of counsel. Appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Before RICH, ALMOND, BALDWIN, LANE, Judges, and CLARK, Justice (Ret.), United States Supreme Court, sitting by designation. BALDWIN, Judge. This is an appeal from the Trademark Trial

  4. Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration

    15 U.S.C. § 1052   Cited 1,580 times   260 Legal Analyses
    Granting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"