Moran Printing, Inc.

16 Cited authorities

Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board
313 U.S. 177 (1941) Cited 872 times
Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”
Price v. Rochford
947 F.2d 829 (7th Cir. 1991) Cited 203 times
Holding that a cause of action for violation of the automatic stay survives the termination of the bankruptcy proceeding
Orloff v. Cleland
708 F.2d 372 (9th Cir. 1983) Cited 87 times
Finding that it was unclear what a hospital administrator, who admitted to speaking to the press, actually told the press
N.L.R.B. v. Madison Courier, Inc.
472 F.2d 1307 (D.C. Cir. 1972) Cited 98 times
Holding that "[i]f the discriminatee accepts significantly lower-paying work too soon after the discrimination in question, he may be subject to a reduction in back pay on the ground that he willfully incurred a loss by accepting an `unsuitably' low paying position"
Snyder v. Whittaker Corp.
839 F.2d 1085 (5th Cir. 1988) Cited 58 times
Holding that a statement does not fall under the hearsay rule if it was offered to prove that certain statements were made to defendant corporation
N.L.R.B. v. Mastro Plastics Corporation
354 F.2d 170 (2d Cir. 1965) Cited 96 times
In Mastro, the relatives of two deceased discriminatees had testified as to the discriminatees' diligent searches for work.
Vulcan Hart Corp.
718 F.2d 269 (8th Cir. 1983) Cited 44 times
Holding “Rule 408 excludes evidence of settlement offers only if such evidence is offered to prove liability for or invalidity of the claim under negotiation”
DiMucci Const. Co. v. N.L.R.B
24 F.3d 949 (7th Cir. 1994) Cited 23 times
Listing factors courts consider in reviewing an NLRB determination of joint employment
N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc.
311 F.2d 447 (8th Cir. 1963) Cited 71 times
In N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (C.A. 8), it is said that "in a back pay proceeding the burden is upon the General Counsel to show the gross amounts of back pay due.
N.L.R.B. v. Miami Coca-Cola Bottling Company
360 F.2d 569 (5th Cir. 1966) Cited 51 times
Permitting "non-deduction of supplemental earnings . . . where an employee who had spare-time earnings prior to discharge from his regular job continued in the same spare-time job during his period of discharge," and further holding that as long as employee was "moonlighting before his unlawful discharge," amounts earned in any "spare time employment" should not be used to reduce back-pay award

Moran Printing, Inc.

16 Cited authorities

Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

Holding that a cause of action for violation of the automatic stay survives the termination of the bankruptcy proceeding

Finding that it was unclear what a hospital administrator, who admitted to speaking to the press, actually told the press

Holding that "[i]f the discriminatee accepts significantly lower-paying work too soon after the discrimination in question, he may be subject to a reduction in back pay on the ground that he willfully incurred a loss by accepting an `unsuitably' low paying position"

Holding that a statement does not fall under the hearsay rule if it was offered to prove that certain statements were made to defendant corporation

In Mastro, the relatives of two deceased discriminatees had testified as to the discriminatees' diligent searches for work.

Holding “Rule 408 excludes evidence of settlement offers only if such evidence is offered to prove liability for or invalidity of the claim under negotiation”

Listing factors courts consider in reviewing an NLRB determination of joint employment

In N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (C.A. 8), it is said that "in a back pay proceeding the burden is upon the General Counsel to show the gross amounts of back pay due.