Moore Mill and Lumber Co.
3 Cited authorities
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.
395 U.S. 575 (1969) Cited 1,035 times 67 Legal AnalysesHolding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
N.L.R.B. v. Barney's Supercenter, Inc.
296 F.2d 91 (3d Cir. 1961) Cited 12 timesNo. 13596. Argued October 5, 1961. Decided November 16, 1961. Marion L. Griffin, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Attys. N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Jack J. Rosenberg, Pittsburgh, Pa., for respondent. Before GOODRICH, STALEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges. STALEY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board ("Board") seeks enforcement of an order
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burton-Dixie Corp.
210 F.2d 199 (10th Cir. 1954) Cited 9 timesIn Burton-Dixie, as here, the employer's attitude made it quite clear that a later request would have been futile, and the court's holding there that the Board properly found a refusal to bargain suggests the propriety of a similar holding here.