§

Moonks, Inn, Inc.

232 N.L.R.B. 978 (N.L.R.B. 1977)
Moonks, Inn, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co.

    344 U.S. 344 (1953)   Cited 368 times
    Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Interboro Contractors, Inc.

    388 F.2d 495 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 80 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Interboro Contractors, Inc., 388 F.2d 495, 500 (2d Cir. 1967), the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit stated that the efforts of an individual employee acting alone to enforce the provisions of a collective bargaining agreement may be deemed "concerted," and thus protected, at least when the individual's interpretation of the agreement has a reasonable basis.

  3. Philip Carey Mfg., v. N.L.R.B

    331 F.2d 720 (6th Cir. 1964)   Cited 42 times

    Nos. 15289, 15330. March 31, 1964. J. Mack Swigert, Cincinnati, Ohio, Frank H. Stewart, Cincinnati, Ohio, on brief; E.J. Fasold, Cincinnati, Ohio, of counsel, for Philip Carey Mfg. Co. Lowell Goerlich, Washington, D.C., for International Union, etc. William J. Avrutis, Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for N.L.R.B. Before

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Selwyn Shoe Manufacturing Corp.

    428 F.2d 217 (8th Cir. 1970)   Cited 23 times
    In NLRB v. Selwyn Shoe Manufacturing Corp., 428 F.2d 217 (8th Cir. 1970), the court's holding was that there was not substantial evidence to support the Board's findings of §§ 8(a)(3) and (1) violations.

  5. National Labor Rel. Board v. B M Excavating

    368 F.2d 624 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 3 times

    No. 20936. November 8, 1966. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Gregory L. Hellbung, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Patrick B. Phelan, Long Beach, Cal., for respondent. Before HAMLEY and ELY, Circuit Judges, and SOLOMON, District Judge. PER CURIAM. The National Labor Relations Board (Board) did not err in finding and concluding that B M Excavating, Inc., is subject to the Board's jurisdiction