Mooney Aircraft, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Mooney Aircraft, Inc.

    310 F.2d 565 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 15 times

    No. 19448. November 28, 1962. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Atty., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, William J. Avrutis, Peter M. Giesey, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Hal Rachal, Midland, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, WISDOM, and GEWIN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before the Court on the petition of the National Labor Relations Board for summary enforcement of its order against Mooney

  2. Paramount Cap Mfg. Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    260 F.2d 109 (8th Cir. 1958)   Cited 17 times

    No. 15985. October 24, 1958. Rehearing Denied November 17, 1958. John R. Stockham, St. Louis, Mo. (Stockham, Roth, Buder Martin, St. Louis, Mo., were with him on the brief), for petitioner. Morris A. Solomon, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., were with him on the brief), for respondent

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Texas Bolt Company

    313 F.2d 761 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 12 times

    No. 19652. February 13, 1963. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Joseph C. Thackery, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, for petitioner. W.D. Deakins, Jr., Houston, Tex. (Vinson, Elkins, Weems Searls, Houston, Tex., of counsel), for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, BROWN and WISDOM, Circuit Judges. JOSEPH C. HUTCHESON, Jr., Circuit Judge. The case

  4. Nahtel Corporation v. West Vir. Pulp Paper Co.

    141 F.2d 1 (2d Cir. 1944)   Cited 25 times

    No. 251. March 7, 1944. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Action by Nahtel Corporation (formerly the Pictorial Review Company) against West Virginia Pulp Paper Company and another to recover the balance due on a contract, for which the defendants, although not parties, are alleged to be responsible. From a summary judgment for defendants, the plaintiff appeals. Affirmed. Herman B. Goodstein, of New York City, for plaintiff-appellant. H. Lewis

  5. National Labor Bd. v. Baker Hotel of Dallas

    311 F.2d 528 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 6 times

    No. 19456. January 3, 1963. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Glen M. Bendixsen, Marion Griffin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Carl B. Callaway, Joe P. Mathews, Dallas, Tex., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and WISDOM and GEWIN, Circuit Judges. TUTTLE, Chief Judge. This is a petition by the Labor Board for enforcement of its order to cease and desist and requiring the respondent to

  6. National Labor Rel. Board v. Fred P. Weissman

    170 F.2d 952 (6th Cir. 1948)   Cited 15 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Fred P. Weissman Co., 170 F.2d 952 (6th Cir. 1948) and N.L.R.B. v. Tempest Shirt Mfg. Co., 285 F.2d 1 (5th Cir. 1960), the ownership of the successor was substantially the same as that of the predecessor.
  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Underwood Mach. Co.

    179 F.2d 118 (1st Cir. 1950)   Cited 11 times
    In NLRB v. Underwood Machinery Co., 179 F.2d 118, 121 (1st Cir. 1949), this court found the reasoning of Judge (later Justice) Minton's Marshall Field dissent "persuasive."