§

Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.

137 N.L.R.B. 346 (N.L.R.B. 1962)
Montgomery Ward & Co., Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Grace Co.

    184 F.2d 126 (8th Cir. 1950)   Cited 43 times

    No. 14107. September 13, 1950. Mozart G. Ratner, Acting Assistant General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel and Irving M. Herman, attorneys, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Burr S. Stottle, Kansas City, Mo. (Robert J. Ingraham, Kansas City, Mo., on the brief), for respondent. Clif. Langsdale, Kansas City, Mo. (John J. Manning, Kansas City

  2. National Biscuit Division v. Leedom

    265 F.2d 101 (D.C. Cir. 1959)   Cited 15 times

    No. 14576. Argued November 19, 1958. Decided January 29, 1959. Certiorari Denied June 1, 1959. See 79 S.Ct. 1151. Mr. Abraham J. Harris, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. John V. Long and James H. Heller, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellant. Mr. Norton J. Come, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, and

  3. Kearney Trecker v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    210 F.2d 852 (7th Cir. 1954)   Cited 16 times
    In Kearney Trecker Corp. v. NLRB (CCA), 210 F.2d 852, certiorari denied, 348 U.S. 824 (75 S Ct 38, 99 L ed 649), the court stated that where there is an organizational disagreement in regard to recognition the board may abrogate its "contract bar policy" and when it will do so in order to effect the policy of the Federal act is entirely a matter of board policy and discretion. See, also, NLRB v. Grace Co. (CCA), 184 F.2d 126, 129.

  4. Union Carbide Carbon v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    244 F.2d 672 (6th Cir. 1957)   Cited 10 times
    In Union Carbide and Carbon Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 244 F.2d 672 (6th Cir. 1957), also cited by the company, there is no discussion of whether or not unit employees were allowed to vote on the merger of their union with another at an international level.

  5. National Labor Board v. Libbey-Owens-Ford

    241 F.2d 831 (4th Cir. 1957)   Cited 10 times

    No. 7347. Argued January 22, 1957. Decided March 11, 1957. Arnold Ordman, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and William J. Avrutis, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Louis R. Becker, Washington, D.C. (Edward T. Cheyfitz, Washington, D.C., on brief), for respondents. Abraham L. Friedman, Newark, N.J. (Samuel