§

Montex Drilling Co.

122 N.L.R.B. 139 (N.L.R.B. 1958)
Montex Drilling Co.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 871 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

  2. Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co.

    344 U.S. 344 (1953)   Cited 368 times
    Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Townsend

    185 F.2d 378 (9th Cir. 1950)   Cited 30 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Townsend, 9 Cir., 185 F.2d 378, this court found jurisdiction in respect to the activities of a local Hudson automobile dealer where it appeared that while the respondent, operating at Santa Maria, California, purchased all of his new automobiles from the Hudson Sales Corporation at Los Angeles, yet the latter organization shipped all of such automobiles into the State from outside points.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Armstrong Tire

    228 F.2d 159 (5th Cir. 1955)   Cited 12 times
    Upholding Board's determination that later assurances of neutrality did not erase coercive effect of prior statement

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Augusta Chemical Co.

    187 F.2d 63 (5th Cir. 1951)   Cited 13 times

    No. 13359. February 13, 1951. Fannie M. Boyls, Attorney, N.L.R.B., David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Cnsl., N.L.R.B. and A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Cnsl., N.L.R.B., all of Washingston, D.C., for petitioner. W.M. Fulcher, Augusta, Ga., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and McCORD and BORAH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. In this case the labor union involved in the controversy at the plant had not complied with Sec. 9(f), (g), and (h) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Dallas Concrete Co.

    212 F.2d 98 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 8 times

    No. 14813. April 22, 1954. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elizabeth W. Weston, Principal Atty., George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, Elizabeth B. Head, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. George E. Seay, Lucian Touchstone, Malone, Lipscomb Seay, Dallas, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and BORAH, Circuit Judges. HOLMES, Circuit Judge. This is a petition to enforce an order of the National

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Sifers

    171 F.2d 63 (10th Cir. 1948)   Cited 7 times

    No. 3671. November 29, 1948. On Petition for Enforcement of Order of National Relations Board. Petition by National Labor Relations Board against Earl I. Sifers, doing business as Sifers Candy Company, to enforce an order. Order enforced. Herman J. De Koven, of Chicago, Ill. (David P. Findling and Ruth Weyand, both of Washington, D.C., and Samuel M. Kaynard, of New York City, on the brief), for petitioner. Howard M. Immel, of Iola, Kan. (Frederick G. Apt and Mitchell H. Bushey, both of Iola, Kan