§

Monterey County, Etc., Trades Council

142 N.L.R.B. 139 (N.L.R.B. 1963)
Monterey County, Etc., Trades Council

8 Cited authorities

  1. Farmers Irrigation Co. v. McComb

    337 U.S. 755 (1949)   Cited 145 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Farmers Reservoir, for example, the Supreme Court concluded that "the physical operation, control and maintenance" of "canals, reservoirs, and headgates" for a company that stored water and distributed it to farms through the company's canals were activities "[c]learly... not done on a farm."

  2. Mitchell v. Huntsville Wholesale Nurseries

    267 F.2d 286 (5th Cir. 1959)   Cited 28 times
    Holding that the processing by a farmer of commodities of other farmers is incidental to, or in conjunction with, the farming operations of those other farmers and therefore not within the definition of agriculture

  3. Fruit Vegetable Packers v. N.L.R.B

    308 F.2d 311 (D.C. Cir. 1962)   Cited 11 times

    No. 16588. Argued January 22, 1962. Decided June 7, 1962. Petition for Rehearing Denied October 12, 1962. Mr. David Previant, Milwaukee, Wis., with whom Messrs. Hugh Hafer, Seattle, Wash., and David Leo Uelmen, Milwaukee, Wis., were on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. Melvin J. Welles, Atty., N.L.R.B., of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Olaa Sugar Co.

    242 F.2d 714 (9th Cir. 1957)   Cited 13 times

    No. 15143. March 12, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel and Rosanna Blake, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Arthur G. Smith, Smith, Wild, Beebe Cades, J. Edward Collins, James A. King, Bouslog Symonds, Honolulu, Hawaii, and George Andersen, San Francisco, Cal., for respondents. Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and STEPHENS and POPE, Circuit Judges. POPE, Circuit Judge. Before us is the petition

  5. Chapman v. Durkin

    214 F.2d 360 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 13 times
    Holding that hauling fruit away from a farm "cannot be said to be work performed ... on a farm"

  6. Fort Mason Fruit Co. v. Durkin

    214 F.2d 363 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 6 times
    Rejecting argument that employees who worked off a farm were agricultural workers because their work was "necessary to the maintenance and operation" of employer's business that gathered fruit from farms

  7. Section 203 - Definitions

    29 U.S.C. § 203   Cited 6,994 times   280 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that "custom or practice" under a collective-bargaining agreement can make changing clothes noncompensable

  8. Section 152 - Definitions

    29 U.S.C. § 152   Cited 3,213 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Defining a supervisor to include “any individual having authority . . . to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or responsibly to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend such action, if in connection with the foregoing the exercise of such authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment”