Monte Carlo Resort & Casino

20 Cited authorities

  1. Brown v. Illinois

    422 U.S. 590 (1975)   Cited 4,052 times   26 Legal Analyses
    Holding statement was fruit of Fourth Amendment violation where police "illegality . . . had a quality of purposefulness" as "[t]he impropriety of the arrest was obvious" and detectives acknowledged "that the purpose of their action was 'for investigation' or for 'questioning'"
  2. Nardone v. United States

    308 U.S. 338 (1939)   Cited 1,596 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding once a defendant proves a government search is illegal, the government may avail itself of an opportunity to demonstrate the information came from an independent source and was not a product of the tainted search
  3. Carducci v. Regan

    714 F.2d 171 (D.C. Cir. 1983)   Cited 495 times
    Holding limited to non-constitutional claims
  4. F.T.C. v. World Travel Vacation Brokers, Inc.

    861 F.2d 1020 (7th Cir. 1988)   Cited 141 times
    Holding that the district court had power to grant a preliminary injunction under § 13(b) because Congress did not limit the court's inherent equitable powers
  5. Magnesium Casting Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    401 U.S. 137 (1971)   Cited 74 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Approving that practice
  6. Davis Supermarkets, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    2 F.3d 1162 (D.C. Cir. 1993)   Cited 30 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming bargaining order where company's "large number of unfair labor practices, . . . committed by some of the top officials in the company, and . . . directed at numerous employees . . . instilled a strong fear of union representation in the employees."
  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Adco Electric Inc.

    6 F.3d 1110 (5th Cir. 1993)   Cited 20 times
    Holding that employee "recommend[ing] someone for hire and [bringing] problems with apprentice employees to the attention of [his superior] is nothing more than what [the employer] would expect from experienced employees"
  8. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination
  9. N.L.R.B. v. Security Guard Service, Inc.

    384 F.2d 143 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 53 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing "the standard reluctance to apply [a statutory] exception broadly"
  10. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176
  11. Rule 801 - Definitions That Apply to This Article; Exclusions from Hearsay

    Fed. R. Evid. 801   Cited 19,867 times   77 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such a statement must merely be made by the party and offered against that party