Monroe Feed Store

17 Cited authorities

Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board
313 U.S. 177 (1941) Cited 872 times
Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”
Nathanson v. Labor Board
344 U.S. 25 (1952) Cited 279 times
Holding that "if one claimant is to be preferred over others, the purpose should be clear from the statute"
Labor Board v. Gullett Gin Co.
340 U.S. 361 (1951) Cited 211 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding unemployment compensation payments not deductible from back pay award under the National Labor Relations Act
Ches. Del. Canal Co. v. United States
250 U.S. 123 (1919) Cited 128 times
Explaining why public-records are "unusually trustworthy sources of evidence"
Olender v. United States
210 F.2d 795 (9th Cir. 1954) Cited 100 times
Finding file from county's public welfare department should have been excluded as hearsay because it contained an affidavit from a relative and five reports from banks
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Colten
105 F.2d 179 (6th Cir. 1939) Cited 62 times
In National Labor Relations Board v. Colten, 6 Cir., 105 F.2d 179, 183, it was said that "* * * the strife which is sought to be averted is no less an object of legislative solicitude when contract, death, or operation of law brings about change of ownership in the employing agency."
National Labor Rel. Board v. Cashman Auto Co.
223 F.2d 832 (1st Cir. 1955) Cited 20 times
In NLRB v. Cashman Auto Co., 223 F.2d 832, 836 (1st Cir. 1955), the First Circuit noted, over half a century ago, that the principle of mitigation of damages does not require success; it only requires an honest good faith effort by the complaining party.
National Labor Rel. Board v. Moss Planing Mill
224 F.2d 702 (4th Cir. 1955) Cited 17 times
In Moss Planing Mill, the defendant employer had discriminated against two former employees in violation of the National Labor Relations Act.
National Labor Rel. Board v. J.G. Boswell Co.
136 F.2d 585 (9th Cir. 1943) Cited 29 times
Finding the fact that an alleged union activity extends outside the employee's own employment is immaterial when determining if the NLRA was violated
Evanston v. Gunn
99 U.S. 660 (1878) Cited 71 times
Approving district court's use of weather data from U.S. Signal Service

Monroe Feed Store

17 Cited authorities

Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

Holding that "if one claimant is to be preferred over others, the purpose should be clear from the statute"

Holding unemployment compensation payments not deductible from back pay award under the National Labor Relations Act

Explaining why public-records are "unusually trustworthy sources of evidence"

Finding file from county's public welfare department should have been excluded as hearsay because it contained an affidavit from a relative and five reports from banks

In National Labor Relations Board v. Colten, 6 Cir., 105 F.2d 179, 183, it was said that "* * * the strife which is sought to be averted is no less an object of legislative solicitude when contract, death, or operation of law brings about change of ownership in the employing agency."

In NLRB v. Cashman Auto Co., 223 F.2d 832, 836 (1st Cir. 1955), the First Circuit noted, over half a century ago, that the principle of mitigation of damages does not require success; it only requires an honest good faith effort by the complaining party.

In Moss Planing Mill, the defendant employer had discriminated against two former employees in violation of the National Labor Relations Act.

Finding the fact that an alleged union activity extends outside the employee's own employment is immaterial when determining if the NLRA was violated

Approving district court's use of weather data from U.S. Signal Service