§

Monogram Comfort Foods

25-CA-031704 (N.L.R.B. Oct. 31, 2011)
Monogram Comfort Foods

13 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 712 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

  3. S F Market St. Healthcare LLC v. N.L.R.B

    570 F.3d 354 (D.C. Cir. 2009)   Cited 10 times

    No. 07-1439, 07-1502. Argued November 17, 2008. Decided June 30, 2009. John H. Douglas argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner. Amy H. Ginn, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Ronald E. Meisburg, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Jill A. Griffin, Supervisory Attorney. Meredith L. Jason and Jason Walta, Attorneys, entered appearances. Before:

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Unbelievable, Inc.

    71 F.3d 1434 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 23 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Unbelievable, Inc., 71 F.3d 1434 (9th Cir. 1995), we upheld the Board's finding that the employer "engaged in unfair labor practices by eavesdropping on private conversations between employees and [a] Union representative," which occurred in the employee break room.

  5. Parkwood v. N.L.R.B

    521 F.3d 404 (D.C. Cir. 2008)   Cited 5 times
    Explaining that section 10(e) meant “we have no jurisdiction to entertain claim”

  6. Pergament United Sales, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    920 F.2d 130 (2d Cir. 1990)   Cited 20 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "due process is satisfied when a complaint gives a respondent fair notice . . . and when the conduct implicated in the alleged violation has been fully and fairly litigated"

  7. N.L.R.B. v. HQJM of Bayside

    518 F.3d 256 (4th Cir. 2008)   Cited 2 times

    No. 06-2253. Argued: December 5, 2007. Decided: March 10, 2008. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board petitioned for court to enforce its order, 2006 WL 2881901. ARGUED: D. Patton Pelfrey, Frost, Brown, Todd, Louisville, Kentucky, for Respondent. Elizabeth A. Heaney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for Petitioner. Carey Robert Butsavage, Butsavage Associates, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Intervenor. ON BRIEF: John T. Lovett, Frost, Brown, Todd, Louisville, Kentucky, for

  8. West Penn Power Co. v. N.L.R.B

    394 F.3d 233 (4th Cir. 2005)   Cited 4 times

    Nos. 03-1984, 03-2139. Argued: June 3, 2004. Decided: January 12, 2005. Petition for review of National Labor Relations Board. ARGUED: John Clark Unkovic, Reed Smith, L.L.P., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for West Penn Power Company, Potomac Edison Power Company, and Allegheny Energy Service Corporation. Joan Elizabeth Hoyte, Office of the General, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for the Board. Burton E. Rosenthal, Segal, Roitman Coleman, Boston, Massachusetts, for Intervenor. ON BRIEF:

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Int'l Longshoremen's Ware. Union

    283 F.2d 558 (9th Cir. 1960)   Cited 41 times
    Holding labor union culpable under Taft-Hartley Act for acts performed by its agents, i.e., by union stewards

  10. Procter Gamble Mfg. Co. v. N.L.R.B

    603 F.2d 1310 (8th Cir. 1979)   Cited 17 times

    No. 78-1716. Submitted March 12, 1979. Decided August 23, 1979. Harold S. Freeman of Dinsmore, Shohl, Coates Deupree, Cincinnati, Ohio, argued and Michael S. Glassman, Cincinnati, Ohio, on appendix and briefs, for petitioner. Edward S. Dorsey, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. argued, and Andrew E. Tranovich, Atty., John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel; John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel; Robert E. Allen, Acting Assoc. Gen. Counsel; and Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C.,

  11. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,338 times   88 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355

  12. Section 157 - Right of employees as to organization, collective bargaining, etc.

    29 U.S.C. § 157   Cited 3,314 times   98 Legal Analyses
    Granting "employees" the right to unionize