Monark Boat Company

24 Cited authorities

  1. Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

    455 U.S. 385 (1982)   Cited 3,758 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Title VII limitations period should be construed to "honor the remedial purpose of the legislation as a whole without negating the particular purpose of the filing requirement"
  2. United States v. Sherwood

    312 U.S. 584 (1941)   Cited 3,488 times
    Holding that the Claims Court lacked jurisdiction over claims that are not against United States
  3. Carr v. Veterans Administration

    522 F.2d 1355 (5th Cir. 1975)   Cited 95 times
    Holding that adherence to the statutory language of six-month limitation period is necessary because the waiver of sovereign immunity embodied in § 2401 is to be strictly construed
  4. Whipp v. Weinberger

    505 F.2d 800 (6th Cir. 1974)   Cited 32 times
    Ordering dismissal of action for filing complaint one day late
  5. United States v. Easement and Right-Of-Way

    386 F.2d 769 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 25 times
    Holding that filing in takings case was valid only after clerk received it
  6. Zeller v. Folsom

    150 F. Supp. 615 (N.D.N.Y. 1956)   Cited 32 times
    In Zeller v. Folsom, 150 F. Supp. 615-617 (N.D.N.Y. 1956), the Court, in granting the defendant's motion to dismiss, held that "the court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter of this action" because the action was not commenced within the sixty-day statutory period specified in Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act.
  7. Ewing v. Risher

    176 F.2d 641 (10th Cir. 1949)   Cited 41 times
    Denying benefits to a widow because an application was not filed within the time limit set in Section 202(g), 42 U.S.C. § 402(g)
  8. Pennsylvania Co. for Ins., Etc. v. Deckert

    123 F.2d 979 (3d Cir. 1941)   Cited 52 times

    Nos. 7768, 7769, 7773. November 19, 1941. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania; Harry E. Kalodner, Judge. Actions by Robert J. Deckert and another against the Pennsylvania Company for Insurances on Lives and Granting Annuities, and the Independence Shares Corporation, for the appointment of a receiver for liquidation of assets, a determination of a claim, and a distribution of assets among persons entitled thereto, wherein Charles L. Miller

  9. A.G. Reeves Steel Const. Co. v. Weiss

    119 F.2d 472 (6th Cir. 1941)   Cited 46 times
    Holding that it is not "necessary that any particular form should be used by the Commissioner in allowing or rejecting a claim for refund. . . . [so long as] the taxpayer has adequate notice of the Commissioner's action on the claim"
  10. Davidson v. Secretary of Health, Ed., and Welfare

    53 F.R.D. 270 (N.D. Okla. 1971)   Cited 8 times

    Proceeding on motion by the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare to dismiss plaintiff's action to review denial of claim as untimely filed. The District Court, Daugherty, J., held that rule allowing three additional days within which a party required to do an act after service of a notice may perform that act if notice was served upon him by mail was not available to extend 60-day period within which plaintiff was required to file action to review appeals Council's denial of his claim under

  11. Section 405 - Evidence, procedure, and certification for payments

    42 U.S.C. § 405   Cited 161,250 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Ruling out jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1346
  12. Rule 6 - Computing and Extending Time; Time for Motion Papers

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 6   Cited 51,608 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "if the last day [of a period] is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the period continues to run until the end of the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday."
  13. Rule 53 - Masters

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 53   Cited 2,743 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Giving court-appointed masters the power to "regulate all proceedings" before them
  14. Section 504 - Costs and fees of parties

    5 U.S.C. § 504   Cited 659 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing payment of attorney's fees by the Government when a party prevails in a federal agency adjudication
  15. Rule 82 - Jurisdiction and Venue Unaffected

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 82   Cited 484 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Stating that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure “do not extend or limit the jurisdiction of the district courts”