§

Molders Local 164 (Pacific Steel)

270 N.L.R.B. 1105 (N.L.R.B. 1984)
Molders Local 164 (Pacific Steel)

4 Cited authorities

  1. Boys Markets v. Clerks Union

    398 U.S. 235 (1970)   Cited 856 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Norris–LaGuardia Act's anti-injunction provisions do not bar enforcement of arbitration agreements

  2. State of N.Y. v. Loc. 144, Hotel, Nurs. Home, Etc.

    410 F. Supp. 1225 (S.D.N.Y. 1976)   Cited 24 times

    No. 76 Civ. 467. February 26, 1976. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen., New York City, for plaintiff; Allan N. Smiley, Moses Weintraub, Jesse P. Reisner, New York City, of counsel. Vladeck, Elias, Vladeck Lewis, P.C., New York City, for defendants Local 144, Ottley, Kelley and Morgano; Judith P. Vladeck, New York City, of counsel. OPINION GAGLIARDI, District Judge. I The State of New York ("State") instituted this action in the Supreme Court, New York County, against Local 144, Hotel, Nursing Home and

  3. Sea-Land Serv. v. Intern. Longshoremen's Ass'n

    625 F.2d 38 (5th Cir. 1980)   Cited 17 times
    Involving how long an anti strike injunction based on an arbitration clause may continue

  4. Anheuser-Busch v. Local Union No. 133, Intern.

    477 F. Supp. 742 (E.D. Mo. 1979)   Cited 3 times

    No. 79-1083-C(3). October 12, 1979. Dennis C. Donnelly, Bryan, Cave, McPheeters McRoberts, St. Louis, Mo., for plaintiff. Jerome J. Duff, St. Louis, Mo., for defendant. MEMORANDUM FILIPPINE, District Judge. In this action under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 29 U.S.C. § 185, the plaintiff seeks a Boys Markets injunction and an order compelling the defendants to submit various disputes to arbitration. A hearing was held on September 10, 1979, on plaintiff's motion for a