Modern Plating Corp.

Labor Board v. Parts Co.
375 U.S. 405 (1964) Cited 213 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”
Burke Golf Equipment Corp. v. N.L.R.B
284 F.2d 943 (6th Cir. 1960) Cited 11 times
No. 14222. December 28, 1960. Charles F. Wood, Louisville, Ky. (Bernard H. Barnett of Greenebaum, Barnett, Wood Doll, Louisville, Ky., on the brief), for petitioner. Melvin J. Welles, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Abraham A. Dash, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent. Before SIMONS, Senior Circuit Judge, CECIL and WEICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM