M&M Affordable Plumbing, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
  2. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 871 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”
  3. Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.

    373 U.S. 221 (1963)   Cited 358 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  5. Royal Development Co., Ltd. v. N.L.R.B

    703 F.2d 363 (9th Cir. 1983)   Cited 18 times

    Nos. 81-7638, 81-7736. Argued and Submitted August 9, 1982. Decided February 22, 1983. Robert Katz, Jeffrey Harris, Honolulu, Hawaii, for petitioner/cross-respondent. William R. Stewart, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent/cross-petitioner. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before CHAMBERS and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and JAMESON, District Judge. Honorable William J. Jameson, United States District Judge, District of Montana, sitting

  6. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,315 times   84 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355
  7. Section 101 - Issuance of restraining orders and injunctions; limitation; public policy

    29 U.S.C. § 101   Cited 1,299 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Stating that no injunction may issue "except in a strict conformity with the provisions of this chapter"