MLC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY , LLC (ASSIGNEE) et al.

3 Cited authorities

  1. In re Mouttet

    686 F.3d 1322 (Fed. Cir. 2012)   Cited 90 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Finding "the Board's determination that eliminating the optical components of Falk would not destroy its principle of operation to be supported by substantial evidence"
  2. TQ Delta, LLC v. Cisco Sys.

    942 F.3d 1352 (Fed. Cir. 2019)   Cited 41 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Determining that certain expert testimony was conclusory and thus inadequate to support the Board's factfinding regarding motivation to combine
  3. Section 103 - Conditions for patentability; non-obvious subject matter

    35 U.S.C. § 103   Cited 6,158 times   488 Legal Analyses
    Holding the party seeking invalidity must prove "the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains."