MJM Studios of New York

3 Cited authorities

  1. New World Communications v. N.L.R.B

    232 F.3d 943 (8th Cir. 2000)   Cited 5 times
    Recognizing that, despite the language used in MDI Commercial Services, 175 F.3d at 628, the adverse inference rule is generally permissive, citing Rockingham Machine-Lunex Co., 665 F.2d at 305
  2. N.L.R.B. v. New England Lithographic Co.

    589 F.2d 29 (1st Cir. 1978)   Cited 20 times

    No. 78-1122. Argued September 12, 1978. Decided December 14, 1978. Corina Metcalf, Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, John H. Ferguson and Elizabeth Bunn, Attys., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Carol Chandler, Boston, Mass., with whom Robert Chandler, and Stoneman, Chandler Miller, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for respondent

  3. Bituma Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    23 F.3d 1432 (8th Cir. 1994)   Cited 2 times

    Nos. 93-1901, 93-2268. Submitted December 15, 1993. Decided May 11, 1994. Robert W. Rasch, Orlando, FL, argued (Thomas P. Moran and Kelly T. Blystone, on the brief), for petitioner. Margaret Luke, Washington, DC, argued, for respondent. Petition for the review of National Labor Relations Board. Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges. FAGG, Circuit Judge. This labor law case arises from the certification of a union following a representation election victory at Bituma Corporation's asphalt