ยง

Mitsubishi Aircraft International, Inc.

212 N.L.R.B. 856 (N.L.R.B. 1974)
Mitsubishi Aircraft International, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Central Hardware Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    407 U.S. 539 (1972)   Cited 142 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Finding that retail store parking lot was not "open to the public" and that the retail store could exclude nonemployee union members from parking lot

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Neuhoff Bros., Packers, Inc.

    375 F.2d 372 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 21 times

    No. 23330. March 23, 1967. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Janet A. Kohn, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, George B. Driesen, Karen W. Ferguson, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for appellant. Fritz L. Lyne, Erich F. Klein, Jr., Lyne, Klein French, Dallas, Tex., for appellee. Before BROWN, COLEMAN and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges. JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge. The Board petitions for enforcement of its Order holding that the Employer violated

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Ambox, Incorporated

    357 F.2d 138 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 20 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Ambox, Inc., 357 F.2d 138 (5 Cir. 1966), both the attorney for the employer and the president of the Company were guilty of coercive measures in their attempts to obtain copies of statements made to Board investigators.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Daylin, Inc., Discount Division

    496 F.2d 484 (6th Cir. 1974)   Cited 9 times
    In Daylin, the retail store's no-solicitation rule prohibited all solicitation on its premises during "paid working hours.

  6. Central Hardware Company v. N.L.R.B

    439 F.2d 1321 (8th Cir. 1971)   Cited 9 times

    No. 20199. March 24, 1971. Rehearing Denied April 26, 1971. Keith E. Mattern, St. Louis, Mo., Ronald L. Aylward, John F. Gillespie, St. Louis, Mo., for petitioner. Marvin Roth, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., for respondent. Robert Karmel, Chicago, Ill., for intervenor. Before GIBSON and BRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and McMANUS, Chief District Judge. PER

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Roseyln Bakeries, Inc.

    471 F.2d 165 (7th Cir. 1972)   Cited 5 times

    No. 71-1927. Argued October 25, 1972. Decided December 4, 1972. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Joseph C. Thackery, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Herbert C. Snyder, Jr., George J. Zazas, Indianapolis, Ind., for respondent. Before KILEY, Circuit Judge, KILKENNY, Senior Circuit Judge and STEVENS, Circuit Judge. Senior Circuit Judge John F. Kilkenny of the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation. KILKENNY, Circuit Judge: Before us for enforcement is the order of petitioner

  8. Hoover Design Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    402 F.2d 987 (6th Cir. 1968)   Cited 7 times
    In Hoover Design Corp. v. NLRB, 402 F.2d 987 (6th Cir. 1968), this Court ruled that the discharge of an employee for threatening to go to the Board or threatening to file charges with the Board did not constitute a violation of ยง 8(a)(4).

  9. Exide Alkaline Battery Division of ESB, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    423 F.2d 663 (4th Cir. 1970)   Cited 3 times
    In Exide Alkaline Battery Division of E.S.B., Inc. v. N.L.R.B. (4th Cir. 1970) 423 F.2d 663, enforcing 177 NLRB 778, the court upheld an NLRB finding of a NLRA section 8(a)(1) violation where an employee had been discharged for violating a no-solicitation rule while waiting in line to "clock out" at the end of the work day.

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Universal Cigar Corporation

    425 F.2d 867 (5th Cir. 1970)   Cited 2 times

    No. 28483. May 8, 1970. Rehearing Denied July 7, 1970. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Janet McCaa and Elliott Moore, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Harold A. Boire, Director, Region 12, N.L.R.B., Tampa, Fla., for petitioner. Leo P. Rock, Jr., Tampa, Fla., for respondent. Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and BELL and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Again the NLRB petitions for enforcement of its order finding that the employer engaged in unfair labor practices. In that