§

Missouri Portland Cement Co.

284 N.L.R.B. 432 (N.L.R.B. 1987)
Missouri Portland Cement Co.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    460 U.S. 693 (1983)   Cited 311 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

  2. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."

  3. Axelson, Inc., Subsidiary of U.S.A. v. N.L.R.B

    599 F.2d 91 (5th Cir. 1979)   Cited 11 times

    No. 78-1232. July 20, 1979. Kothe, Nichols Wolfe, Frank B. Wolfe, III, Lynn Paul Mattson, Tulsa, Okl., for petitioner, cross-respondent. Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. counsel, N.L.R.B., Lawrence E. Blatnik, Atty., Washington, D.C., for respondent, cross-petitioner. Petition for Review and Cross Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG and VANCE, Circuit Judges. GEWIN, Circuit Judge: Axelson, Inc., a subsidiary of U.S.A. Industries,

  4. Intern. Broth. of Elec. Wkrs. v. N.L.R.B

    557 F.2d 995 (2d Cir. 1977)   Cited 3 times

    No. 1089, Docket 76-4227. Argued May 27, 1977. Decided July 11, 1977. Laurence J. Cohen, Richard M. Resnick, Robert D. Kurnick, Sherman, Dunn, Cohen Leifer, Washington, D.C., David I. Ashe, Ashe Rifkin, New York City, for petitioners International Broth. of Elec. Workers, AFL-CIO, et al. Paul J. Spielberg, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, and David F. Zorensky, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Charles G. Bakaly, Robert A. Siegel, O'Melveny Myers, Los Angeles, Cal., and Stephen M. Koppekin

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Signal Manufacturing Company

    351 F.2d 471 (1st Cir. 1965)   Cited 4 times

    No. 6563. Heard October 4, 1965. Decided October 14, 1965. Warren M. Davison, Washington, D.C., Attorney, with whom Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, were on brief, for petitioner. Maurice Epstein, Boston, Mass., for respondent. Before ALDRICH, Chief Judge, McENTEE, Circuit Judge, and CAFFREY, District Judge. PER CURIAM. With considerable reluctance, we affirm the NLRB's decision that the employer must