Miramar Sheraton Hotel

32 Cited authorities

  1. United States v. Kubrick

    444 U.S. 111 (1979)   Cited 2,648 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that claim under Federal Tort Claims Act accrued when plaintiff possessed "critical facts that he has been hurt and who has inflicted the injury," and rejecting argument that "plaintiff's ignorance of his legal rights" deferred accrual
  2. United States v. Marion

    404 U.S. 307 (1971)   Cited 3,642 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that due process places some restraints on government delay in bringing an indictment
  3. Klehr v. A. O. Smith Corp.

    521 U.S. 179 (1997)   Cited 556 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "reasonable diligence" was required to invoke the doctrine of fraudulent concealment in the context of civil RICO by analogy to antitrust cases
  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 657 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
  5. Director, Off. of Work. Comp. v. Greenwich Collieries

    512 U.S. 267 (1994)   Cited 450 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, under the Administrative Procedure Act, the burden of proof encompasses the burden of persuasion; when the evidence is evenly balanced, the party with the burden must lose
  6. Burnett v. N.Y. Cent. R. Co.

    380 U.S. 424 (1965)   Cited 1,032 times
    Holding that an action filed in an improper venue tolled the FELA statute of limitations, and noting that "venue objections may be waived by the defendant"
  7. Sure-Tan, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    467 U.S. 883 (1984)   Cited 421 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB could order reinstatement with back pay as a remedy for constructive discharge
  8. Holmberg v. Armbrecht

    327 U.S. 392 (1946)   Cited 1,371 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Erie does not require federal courts to apply state tolling doctrines to federal causes of action
  9. Cada v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.

    920 F.2d 446 (7th Cir. 1990)   Cited 937 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the discovery rule is "read into statutes of limitations in federal-question cases (even when those statutes of limitations are borrowed from state law)"
  10. Telegraphers v. Ry. Express Agency

    321 U.S. 342 (1944)   Cited 674 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding the principles of J.I. Case apply to RLA cases