Mining Specialists

14 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"
  2. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith
  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. C & C Plywood Corp.

    385 U.S. 421 (1967)   Cited 117 times
    Holding that the NLRB has the authority to interpret CBAs in the first instance where its interpretation is for the purpose of “enforc[ing] a statutory right which Congress considered necessary to allow labor and management to get on with the process of reaching fair terms and conditions of employment”
  4. Local Union 1395, Intern. Broth. v. N.L.R.B

    797 F.2d 1027 (D.C. Cir. 1986)   Cited 50 times
    Adopting this section of the Restatement
  5. Alkire v. N.L.R.B

    716 F.2d 1014 (4th Cir. 1983)   Cited 48 times
    Analyzing similar issue on an alter ego theory
  6. N.L.R.B. v. Rockwell-Standard, Trans. Axle

    410 F.2d 953 (6th Cir. 1969)   Cited 44 times

    No. 18651. May 29, 1969. Leonard M. Wagman, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Neal J. Conway, Atty., Washington, D.C., on brief. Leonard L. Scheinholtz, Pittsburgh, Pa., for respondent, Jonathan L. Alder, Reed, Smith, Shaw McClay, Pittsburgh, Pa., on brief. Before PHILLIPS, EDWARDS and PECK, Circuit Judges. Judge Edwards took no part in the consideration of decision of this case

  7. Fugazy Continental Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    725 F.2d 1416 (D.C. Cir. 1984)   Cited 23 times
    Affirming alter ego finding where only portion of company's operations were shut and transferred to a new, "sham" company established to perform the same work
  8. General Motors Corp., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    700 F.2d 1083 (6th Cir. 1983)   Cited 13 times
    Finding that the union need not affirmatively demonstrate the relevance of information requested
  9. N.L.R.B. v. Int'l Bro. of Elec Wkrs., Local 11

    772 F.2d 571 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 9 times

    No. 84-7439. Argued and Submitted March 4, 1985. Decided September 24, 1985. William R. Stewart, Deputy Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick Havard, Atty., Washington, D.C., for petitioner N.L.R.B. Robert Newman, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioners-intervenors Loveall, Sokol and Mott. Elizabeth R. Lishner, Davis, Frommer Jesinger, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before GOODWIN, FLETCHER and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges. GOODWIN

  10. Central Soya Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    867 F.2d 1245 (10th Cir. 1989)   Cited 5 times
    Holding in accretion case that representation rights follow the majority of employees
  11. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,873 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions
  12. Section 1399 - Notice, collection, etc., of withdrawal liability

    29 U.S.C. § 1399   Cited 732 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Granting the employer 90 days to ask the plan sponsor to review its determination of the employer's liability
  13. Section 22A-2-77 - Quarterly report by operator of mine; exception as to certain inactive mines

    W. Va. Code § 22A-2-77

    On or before the end of each quarter, the operator of each mine, regulated under the provisions of this chapter or article three or four, chapter twenty-two of this code, shall file with the director a report with respect thereto covering the next preceding quarter which shall reflect the number of accidents which have occurred at each such mine, the number of persons employed, the days worked and the actual raw tonnage mined. Quarters are based on a calendar year. Such report shall be made upon