§

Mini-Circuits Laboratory

228 N.L.R.B. 601 (N.L.R.B. 1977)
Mini-Circuits Laboratory

11 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 470 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  3. Solitron Devices v. Island Territory of Curacao

    416 U.S. 986 (1974)   Cited 130 times
    Granting enforcement

  4. Local 542, Int'l Un. of Oper. E. v. N.L.R.B

    328 F.2d 850 (3d Cir. 1964)   Cited 44 times

    No. 14286. Argued October 10, 1963. Decided March 13, 1964. Abraham E. Freedman, Philadelphia, Pa. (Martin J. Vigderman, Wilfred F. Lorry, Freedman, Landy Lorry, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner. Leo Maguire, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for respondent. Earle K. Shawe, Baltimore, Md. (Sidney J. Barban, Baltimore,

  5. Harlan #4 Coal Company v. N.L.R.B

    490 F.2d 117 (6th Cir. 1974)   Cited 27 times

    No. 72-1997. Argued June 9, 1973. Decided January 10, 1974. John E. Jenkins, Jr., Jenkins, Schaub Fenstermaker, Huntington, W. Va., on brief for petitioner. Fredric Sagan, N.L.R.B. for respondent; Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before WEICK, EDWARDS and McCREE, Circuit Judges. McCREE

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ford

    170 F.2d 735 (6th Cir. 1948)   Cited 49 times

    No. 10605. November 15, 1948. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order of the board against Wilbur H. Ford and others, doing business as Ford Brothers. Decree of enforcement granted. Harold Cranefield, of Detroit, Mich., and Robert N. Denham, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., of Washington, D.C. (David P. Finding, Ruth Weyand, and Thomas F. Maher, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Brown-Dunkin Company

    287 F.2d 17 (10th Cir. 1961)   Cited 28 times

    No. 6402. January 19, 1961. Rosanna A. Blake, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Dominick L. Manoli, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Morton Namrow, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Karl H. Mueller, Fort Worth, Tex. (Harold E. Mueller, Fort Worth, Tex., on brief), for respondent. Before MURRAH, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges. MURRAH, Chief Judge. This petition is to enforce an order of the National Labor Relations Board finding the respondent, a large department store

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Illinois Tool Works

    153 F.2d 811 (7th Cir. 1946)   Cited 47 times
    Noting that the test for violations of sec. 8, now codified as sec. 8, of the NLRA is whether "the employer engaged in conduct which, it may reasonably be said, tends to interfere with the free exercise of employee rights under the Act," and that actual or successful coercion need not be shown in order for the Board to find a violation

  9. Darlington Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B

    397 F.2d 760 (4th Cir. 1968)   Cited 17 times
    Affirming without discussion

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Henriksen, Inc.

    481 F.2d 1156 (5th Cir. 1973)   Cited 5 times
    In Henriksen, for example, the Company president stood before the employees and stated that she would bargain with the union in the same way she bargained with her suppliers — that is, in a very "hardnosed" fashion.