Mine Workers (New Beckley Mining)

5 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce
  2. Labor Board v. Rice Milling Co.

    341 U.S. 665 (1951)   Cited 126 times
    Noting that section 8(b) was intended to preserve "the right of labor organizations to bring pressure to bear on offending employers in primary labor disputes"
  3. Labor Board v. Servette

    377 U.S. 46 (1964)   Cited 74 times
    Holding under section 8(b) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(b), that statutory protection for the distribution of handbills would be undermined if a threat to engage in protected conduct were not itself protected
  4. Local Union No. 501 v. N.L.R.B

    756 F.2d 888 (D.C. Cir. 1985)   Cited 12 times

    Nos. 84-1340, 84-1464. Argued January 17, 1985. Decided March 15, 1985. Ralph P. Katz, New York City, for petitioner in No. 84-1340 and cross-respondent in No. 84-1464. Scott Meza, Chapel Hill, N.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board, of the Bar of the Supreme Court of North Carolina pro hac vice by special leave of the Court, with whom Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for respondent in No. 84-1340 and cross-petitioner

  5. Campbell v. Mincey

    542 F.2d 573 (5th Cir. 1976)   Cited 5 times

    No. 76-1325. October 20, 1976. N.D.Miss., 413 F.Supp. 16. DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS AFFIRMED.