Mine Workers Local 9639 (Beth-Elkhorn)

8 Cited authorities

  1. Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co.

    370 U.S. 238 (1962)   Cited 783 times
    Holding that a court should decide whether a clause providing for arbitration of various "grievances" covers claims for damages for breach of a no-strike agreement
  2. Golden State Bottling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    414 U.S. 168 (1973)   Cited 497 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Rule 65(d) allows enforcement of orders against successors of enjoined parties
  3. Regal Knitwear Co. v. Board

    324 U.S. 9 (1945)   Cited 428 times
    Holding "successors and assigns" are liable for contempt if they are properly within the scope of the injunction under Rule 65(d)
  4. Southport Pet., Co. v. N.L.R.B

    315 U.S. 100 (1942)   Cited 187 times
    Ruling that dissolution of company and transfer of assets did not prevent enforcement of a Board order
  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Jarm Enterprises, Inc.

    785 F.2d 195 (7th Cir. 1986)   Cited 24 times
    Assessing business operations, plant, workforce, job positions, working conditions, supervisors, machinery, equipment, methods of production, and manufactured product or service to determine successor liability under NLRA
  6. United States Pipe and Foundry Co. v. N.L.R.B

    398 F.2d 544 (5th Cir. 1968)   Cited 23 times

    No. 24837. July 23, 1968. John J. Coleman, Jr., A. Henry Gaede, Jr., Birmingham, Ala., for petitioner; Allen Poppleton, Bradley, Arant, Rose White, Birmingham, Ala., of counsel. Benj. L. Erdreich, Birmingham, Ala., Michael Gottesman, Washington, D.C., Bernard Kleinman, Chicago, Ill., Elliot Bredhoff, George H. Cohen, Washington, D.C., Jerome Cooper, Birmingham, Ala., for intervenor. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William F. Wachter, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local Union No. 46

    727 F.2d 234 (2d Cir. 1984)   Cited 5 times

    Cal. No. 151, Docket 83-4045. Argued September 19, 1983. Decided January 31, 1984. Charles P. Donnelly, Washington, D.C. (William Wachter, William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Assoc. Gen. Counsel and Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Wash., D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Robert C. Cohen, Philadelphia, Pa. (Markowitz Richman, Philadelphia, Pa., of counsel), for respondent Local Union No. 46, Metallic Lathers and Reinforcing Iron

  8. Lawless v. Brotherhood of Painters

    143 Cal.App.2d 474 (Cal. Ct. App. 1956)   Cited 27 times

    Docket No. 21566. July 27, 1956. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Clarence M. Hanson, Judge. Affirmed in part and reversed in part. William R. Walsh for Appellants. Alexander H. Schullman, Jack R. Berger, and Herbert S. Thatcher for Respondents. MOORE, P.J. Cross-complainant Sorrell, a former officer of a local union, and intervener Contini, both noteholders of that local, appeal from a judgment denying damages resulting from the allegedly wrongful discharge of