§

Mine Workers District 5 (Pennsylvania Mines)

317 N.L.R.B. 663 (N.L.R.B. 1995)
Mine Workers District 5 (Pennsylvania Mines)

13 Cited authorities

  1. Vaca v. Sipes

    386 U.S. 171 (1967)   Cited 4,217 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"

  2. Air Line Pilots v. O'Neill

    499 U.S. 65 (1991)   Cited 1,079 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that this rule "applies to all union activity"

  3. Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight

    424 U.S. 554 (1976)   Cited 1,146 times
    Holding that employees can challenge final decision of arbitrator only if they "prove . . . the Union's breach of duty tainting the decision of the [arbitrator]"

  4. Motor Coach Employees v. Lockridge

    403 U.S. 274 (1971)   Cited 830 times
    Holding wrongful discharge action brought in state court precluded by pervasiveness of federal regulation in the area

  5. Ford Motor Co. v. Huffman

    345 U.S. 330 (1953)   Cited 882 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union acting in its representative capacity owes a duty of fair representation to those on whose behalf it acts

  6. Steele v. L. N.R. Co.

    323 U.S. 192 (1944)   Cited 962 times
    Holding that a labor organization must represent all members of a "craft or class of employees . . . regardless of their union affiliations or want of them"

  7. Cleveland v. Porca Co.

    38 F.3d 289 (7th Cir. 1994)   Cited 185 times
    Holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow the plaintiffs to amend their complaint when they waited until after discovery had been completed and summary judgment motions had been fully briefed before filing their motion to amend

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Miranda Fuel Co., Inc.

    326 F.2d 172 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 98 times

    No. 73, Docket 26232. Argued October 21, 1963. Decided December 11, 1963. Melvin J. Welles, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Herman M. Levy, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Samuel J. Cohen, New York City (Jack Last and Cohen Weiss, New York City, on the brief), for respondent Union. Ruth

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. American Postal Workers Union

    618 F.2d 1249 (8th Cir. 1980)   Cited 48 times
    In National Labor Relations Bd. v. Postal Workers (C.A.8, 1980), 618 F.2d 1249, 1255, the Eighth Circuit held that "`[a]rbitrary conduct alone may suffice to establish a violation of the duty of fair representation' but that `[m]ere negligence, poor judgment or ineptitude are insufficient to establish a breach of the duty of fair representation.'"

  10. Nida v. Plant Protection Ass'n National

    7 F.3d 522 (6th Cir. 1993)   Cited 27 times
    Holding that a union's decision to settle a group grievance for cash instead of reinstatement was not arbitrary