§

Miloslav Muller, Complainant, v. Ed Schafer, Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Agency.

0120083503 (E.E.O.C. Oct. 24, 2008)
Miloslav Muller, Complainant, v. Ed Schafer, Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Agency.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.

    477 U.S. 242 (1986)   Cited 240,927 times   39 Legal Analyses
    Holding that summary judgment is not appropriate if "the dispute about a material fact is ‘genuine,’ that is, if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party"

  2. Harris v. Forklift Sys., Inc.

    510 U.S. 17 (1993)   Cited 12,617 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "no single factor is required" to show a hostile work environment, including "whether [the acts are] physically threatening"

  3. Clark Cty. Sch. Dist. v. Breeden

    532 U.S. 268 (2001)   Cited 5,521 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the temporal proximity requirement to establish a prima facie case "between an employer's knowledge of protected activity and an adverse employment action as sufficient evidence" must be "very close"

  4. Meritor Sav. Bank v. Vinson

    477 U.S. 57 (1986)   Cited 6,584 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that sexual harassment may be actionable under Title VII as discrimination on the basis of sex if it is sufficiently severe and pervasive

  5. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 335,725 times   160 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit