§

Milo Express, Inc.

212 N.L.R.B. 313 (N.L.R.B. 1974)
Milo Express, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,036 times   71 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Textile Workers v. Darlington Co.

    380 U.S. 263 (1965)   Cited 168 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has the absolute right, at least as far as the NLRA is concerned, to terminate his entire business for any reason

  3. J.G. Roy Sons Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    251 F.2d 771 (1st Cir. 1958)   Cited 21 times

    No. 5282. January 27, 1958. Lawrence M. Kearns, Boston, Mass., with whom Arthur M. Marshall, Springfield, Mass., and Morgan, Brown Kearns, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for petitioner. Norton J. Come, Attorney, Washington, D.C., with whom Jerome D. Fenton, General Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Associate General Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for respondent. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges. HARTIGAN, Circuit

  4. Miami N. Pressmen's L. No. 46 v. N.L.R.B

    322 F.2d 405 (D.C. Cir. 1963)   Cited 15 times

    No. 17416. Argued May 28, 1963. Decided June 27, 1963. Mr. John S. McLellan, Kingsport, Tenn., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Tennessee, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Neal Rutledge, Miami, Fla., Herbert S. Thatcher and David S. Barr, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Warren M. Davison, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board at the time the brief was filed, Dominick

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Gibraltar Industries, Inc.

    307 F.2d 428 (4th Cir. 1962)   Cited 13 times
    Granting enforcement petition based on finding that "there is substantial evidence in the record to support the Board's conclusion" viewing the "separate legal entities as a single employing enterprise"

  6. Bachman Machine Company v. N.L.R.B

    266 F.2d 599 (8th Cir. 1959)   Cited 14 times

    No. 16122. May 15, 1959. Harold A. Thomas, Jr., St. Louis, Mo. (Carroll C. Gilpin and Fordyce, Mayne, Hartman, Renard Stribling, St. Louis, Mo., on the brief), for petitioner. Fannie M. Boyls, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., and Fred J. Hahn, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent. Before SANBORN, WOODROUGH and VAN OOSTERHOUT, Circuit