§

Millwrights, Local 102

246 N.L.R.B. 923 (N.L.R.B. 1979)
Millwrights, Local 102

13 Cited authorities

  1. National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    386 U.S. 612 (1967)   Cited 392 times
    Holding that union employees' refusal to install third-party manufacturer's product was not prohibited under § 158(b)(B), because it was an action "pressuring the [union members'] employer for agreements regulating relations between [the employer] and his own employees"

  2. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

  3. Labor Board v. Fruit Packers

    377 U.S. 58 (1964)   Cited 236 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRA section 8(b)(B) does not prohibit "peaceful picketing . . . limited . . . to persuading Safeway customers not to buy Washington State apples when they traded in Safeway stores"

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Enterprise Ass'n of Steam, Hot Water, Hydraulic Sprinkler, Pneumatic Tube, Ice Machine & General Pipefitters

    429 U.S. 507 (1977)   Cited 138 times
    Stating that if a union were to attempt to capture work it had previously acquiesced to non-union workers' performing, such conduct would serve "not to preserve, but to aggrandize, its own position and that of its members," concluding that "[s]uch activity is squarely within the statute" and thus prohibited

  5. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 186 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may picket a secondary employer only when the primary employer is at the job site

  6. Labor Board v. Rice Milling Co.

    341 U.S. 665 (1951)   Cited 126 times
    Noting that section 8(b) was intended to preserve "the right of labor organizations to bring pressure to bear on offending employers in primary labor disputes"

  7. Steelworkers v. Labor Board

    376 U.S. 492 (1964)   Cited 75 times
    Stating that section 8(b) prohibits labor unions from engaging in "secondary boycotting" by "exert[ing] pressure on an employer not involved in the relevant labor dispute ('the secondary employer') in order to obtain a favorable result in the ongoing labor dispute with another employer ('the primary employer')"

  8. Linbeck Const. Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    550 F.2d 311 (5th Cir. 1977)   Cited 14 times
    Affirming 219 N.L.R.B. 997

  9. Enterprise Ass'n of Steam, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    521 F.2d 885 (D.C. Cir. 1975)   Cited 14 times
    In Pipefitters the Supreme Court resolved a dispute among the circuits by affirming the validity of the Board's right to control test as a means of delineating primary activity.

  10. George Koch Sons, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    490 F.2d 323 (4th Cir. 1973)   Cited 15 times

    Nos. 73-1019, 73-1480. Argued October 3, 1973. Decided December 14, 1973. Winthrop A. Johns, Washington, D.C. and Joseph A. Yocum, Evansville, Ind. (Johns Zimmerman, Washington, D.C. and Kahn, Dees, Donovan Kahn, Evansville, Ind., on brief), for petitioner in No. 73-1019. Gerard C. Smetana, Chicago, Ill. (Milton A. Smith, Gen. Counsel, Otto F. Wenzler and Richard B. Berman, Labor Relations Counsel, Washington, D.C., S. Richard Pincus, Lederer, Fox Grove, Chicago, Ill., on brief), for amicus curiae