Millwrights Local 1827 (United Parcel Service)

26 Cited authorities

Hill v. Colorado
530 U.S. 703 (2000) Cited 1,324 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding content neutral a ban on "picketing," "demonstrating," "protest, education, or counseling" even though it may require the government "to review the content of the statements made"
Milkovich v. Lorain Journal
497 U.S. 1 (1990) Cited 1,752 times 14 Legal Analyses
Holding that a statement that implies a false assertion of fact may be actionable even if it is couched as a statement of opinion
Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc.
512 U.S. 753 (1994) Cited 658 times
Holding that an injunction against anti-abortion protesters was not viewpoint discriminatory because "none of the restrictions imposed by the court were directed at the contents of petitioner's message."
DeBartolo Corp. v. Fla. Gulf Coast Trades Council
485 U.S. 568 (1988) Cited 729 times 10 Legal Analyses
Holding that a union’s distribution of handbills at the entrances of a shopping mall was not threatening, coercing, or restraining within meaning of section 8(b) because there had been "no violence, picketing, or patrolling," and "no suggestion that the leaflets had any coercive effect on customers of the mall"
Naacp v. Claiborne Hardware Co.
458 U.S. 886 (1982) Cited 806 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that a state common law prohibition on malicious interference with business could not, under the circumstances, be constitutionally applied to a civil rights boycott of white merchants
Linn v. Plant Guard Workers
383 U.S. 53 (1966) Cited 732 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding as preempted all defamation actions in labor disputes except those published with actual malice
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Catholic Bishop
440 U.S. 490 (1979) Cited 459 times 48 Legal Analyses
Holding that church-operated schools are not subject to NLRB jurisdiction
Thornhill v. Alabama
310 U.S. 88 (1940) Cited 1,704 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that a law is overbroad if it does not aim specifically at evils within the allowable area of control, but sweeps within its ambit other activities that constitute an exercise of First Amendment rights
Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council
341 U.S. 675 (1951) Cited 494 times 1 Legal Analyses
Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce
Labor Board v. Fruit Packers
377 U.S. 58 (1964) Cited 236 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that NLRA section 8(b)(B) does not prohibit "peaceful picketing . . . limited . . . to persuading Safeway customers not to buy Washington State apples when they traded in Safeway stores"

Millwrights Local 1827 (United Parcel Service)

26 Cited authorities

Holding content neutral a ban on "picketing," "demonstrating," "protest, education, or counseling" even though it may require the government "to review the content of the statements made"

Holding that a statement that implies a false assertion of fact may be actionable even if it is couched as a statement of opinion

Holding that an injunction against anti-abortion protesters was not viewpoint discriminatory because "none of the restrictions imposed by the court were directed at the contents of petitioner's message."

Holding that a state common law prohibition on malicious interference with business could not, under the circumstances, be constitutionally applied to a civil rights boycott of white merchants

Holding as preempted all defamation actions in labor disputes except those published with actual malice

Holding that church-operated schools are not subject to NLRB jurisdiction

Holding that a law is overbroad if it does not aim specifically at evils within the allowable area of control, but sweeps within its ambit other activities that constitute an exercise of First Amendment rights

Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce

Holding that NLRA section 8(b)(B) does not prohibit "peaceful picketing . . . limited . . . to persuading Safeway customers not to buy Washington State apples when they traded in Safeway stores"