Miller Industries Towing Equipment

13 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
  2. Lechmere, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    502 U.S. 527 (1992)   Cited 156 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board erred in finding that employer should have allowed union on its premises because it had no other way to reach its target audience, inasmuch as in reaching its decision the Board misconstrued prior Supreme Court precedent
  3. Am. Home Assur. Co. v. Comm. Union Assur. Co.

    449 U.S. 871 (1980)   Cited 172 times

    No. 80-73. October 6, 1980. Ct. App. La., 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 379 So. 2d 757.

  4. Textile Workers v. Darlington Co.

    380 U.S. 263 (1965)   Cited 168 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has the absolute right, at least as far as the NLRA is concerned, to terminate his entire business for any reason
  5. Labor Board v. Cabot Carbon Co.

    360 U.S. 203 (1959)   Cited 57 times
    Concluding that "dealing with" as used in 29 U.S.C. § 152 is a "broad term" and is not synonymous to "bargaining with"
  6. Fieldcrest Cannon v. National Labor Rela. Bd.

    97 F.3d 65 (4th Cir. 1996)   Cited 24 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that demeanor is a factor in determining credibility
  7. General Electric Co. v. Nat'l Labor rel

    117 F.3d 627 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 20 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Enforcing Board decision that distribution of postelection benefits while objections to election were still unresolved was impermissible attempt to interfere with employees' freedom of choice about unionization
  8. N.L.R.B. v. Overnite Transp. Co.

    938 F.2d 815 (7th Cir. 1991)   Cited 23 times
    Holding that employer engaged in surface bargaining despite the fact employer had attended six bargaining sessions with union, commented on proposals, offered counterproposals, and maintained bargaining stance that had at least some merit, because vice president of employer expressly stated that employer would not sign contract with union, openly threatened to shut down terminal in order to defeat union, and implied that employer would force strike situation and permanently dismiss those employees who left to join picket lines
  9. Electromation, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    35 F.3d 1148 (7th Cir. 1994)   Cited 19 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding finding of domination in similar situation
  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. River Togs, Inc.

    382 F.2d 198 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 48 times
    In NLRB v. River Togs, Inc. (2d Cir. July 27, 1967) 382 F.2d 198, however, we recognized some of the limitations of the authorization card procedure, calling for scrutiny of the manner of execution of the cards.