§

Miller & Anderson, Inc.

364 NLRB No. 39 (N.L.R.B. 2016)
Miller & Anderson, Inc.

28 Cited authorities

  1. Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Res. Def. Council

    467 U.S. 837 (1984)   Cited 16,292 times   628 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts "must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress"

  2. Vaca v. Sipes

    386 U.S. 171 (1967)   Cited 4,217 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, under the LMRA, an "individual employee has absolute right to have his grievance taken to arbitration regardless of the provisions of the applicable collective bargaining agreement"

  3. Barrentine v. Ark.-Best Freight Sys.

    450 U.S. 728 (1981)   Cited 1,709 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Fair Labor Standards Act claims may be brought in federal court notwithstanding an arbitration provision in a CBA

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Amax Coal Co.

    453 U.S. 322 (1981)   Cited 368 times
    Holding that a management-appointed trustee to a multiemployer pension plan could not be considered a management representative

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.

    420 U.S. 251 (1975)   Cited 434 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness

  6. First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    452 U.S. 666 (1981)   Cited 270 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.

    388 U.S. 175 (1967)   Cited 335 times
    Holding that majority rule concept is at the center of federal labor policy

  8. American Hospital Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    499 U.S. 606 (1991)   Cited 168 times
    Holding that statements in committee reports were not binding on the agency and do not "ha[ve] the force of law, for the Constitution is quite explicit about the procedure that Congress must follow in legislating"

  9. Labor Board v. Erie Resistor Corp.

    373 U.S. 221 (1963)   Cited 359 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding Board decision prohibiting employer from granting super-seniority to strike-breakers because "[s]uper-seniority renders future bargaining difficult, if not impossible"

  10. Charles D. Bonanno Linen Service, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    454 U.S. 404 (1982)   Cited 116 times
    Holding that courts must not "substitute [their] judgment for those of the Board with respect to the issues that Congress intended the Board should resolve"

  11. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,104 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

  12. Section 157 - Right of employees as to organization, collective bargaining, etc.

    29 U.S.C. § 157   Cited 3,318 times   98 Legal Analyses
    Granting "employees" the right to unionize

  13. Section 152 - Definitions

    29 U.S.C. § 152   Cited 3,219 times   28 Legal Analyses
    Defining a supervisor to include “any individual having authority . . . to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or responsibly to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend such action, if in connection with the foregoing the exercise of such authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment”

  14. Section 159 - Representatives and elections

    29 U.S.C. § 159   Cited 2,450 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Granting a bargaining unit the exclusive right to represent employees in it