Milk Wagon Drivers & Creamery Wkrs.

7 Cited authorities

  1. National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    386 U.S. 612 (1967)   Cited 392 times
    Holding that union employees' refusal to install third-party manufacturer's product was not prohibited under § 158(b)(B), because it was an action "pressuring the [union members'] employer for agreements regulating relations between [the employer] and his own employees"
  2. Houston Insulation Contractors Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    386 U.S. 664 (1967)   Cited 29 times
    In Houston Insulation Contractors' Ass'n v. NLRB, 386 U.S. 664, 87 S.Ct. 1278, 18 L.Ed.2d 389 (1967), the Court, relying largely on the reasoning in National Woodwork, held that a work preservation agreement between a company and a local union could be effectuated by another local of the same union.
  3. Meat Hwy. Dri., Dockmen, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    335 F.2d 709 (D.C. Cir. 1964)   Cited 44 times
    Subcontracting in cases of lack of equipment to companies employing members of same local whenever possible
  4. Collins Aikman Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    383 F.2d 722 (4th Cir. 1967)   Cited 22 times
    Paying employee $7 to be observer at election is an "unreasonable or excessive economic inducement" potentially influencing other employees and is ground to set aside election
  5. District No. 9 v. N.L.R.B

    315 F.2d 33 (D.C. Cir. 1962)   Cited 24 times

    No. 16901. Argued September 27, 1962. Decided November 15, 1962. Mr. Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Plato E. Papps, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Melvin J. Welles, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, National Labor Relations

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Joint Council of Teamsters No. 38

    338 F.2d 23 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 16 times
    Subcontracting restricted to signatories of multi-employer agreement
  7. Minnesota Milk Company v. N.L.R.B

    314 F.2d 761 (8th Cir. 1963)   Cited 7 times

    No. 16966. March 7, 1963. Thomas M. Vogt, St. Paul, Minn., made argument for petitioner; Felhaber, Larson Fenlon, St. Paul, Minn., with him on the brief. Hans J. Lehmann, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., made argument for respondent; Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Melvin J. Welles, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., with him on the brief. Donald Savelkoul, Minneapolis, Minn., made argument for intervenor and