4 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council
341 U.S. 675 (1951) Cited 494 times 1 Legal AnalysesAffirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce
Electrical Workers v. Labor Board
341 U.S. 694 (1951) Cited 246 times 2 Legal AnalysesHolding that the prohibition of picketing in furtherance of unlawful objectives is not an abridgement of free speech
International Bhd. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
181 F.2d 34 (2d Cir. 1950) Cited 89 timesNo. 102, Docket 21365. Argued January 4, 1950. Decided February 24, 1950. S.A. Syme, White Plains, N.Y., L. Sherman, P.R. Collins, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. A.N. Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Robert N. Denham, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Albert M. Dreyer, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., James V. Altieri, New York City, for respondent. Louis Sherman, Washington, D.C., for Brotherhood of Elect
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local Union 522, Lumber Drivers, Warehousemen & Handlers, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers
294 F.2d 811 (3d Cir. 1961) Cited 3 timesNo. 13606. Argued September 22, 1961. Decided October 3, 1961. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, James A. Ryan, Atty., National Labor Relations Bd., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Milton M. Konowe, New York City (Katz Wolchok, New York City, on the brief), for respondent. Before GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. In this case the respondent