§

MIKE-SELL'S POTATO CHIP COMPANY

366 NLRB No. 29 (N.L.R.B. 2018)
MIKE-SELL'S POTATO CHIP COMPANY

11 Cited authorities

  1. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 731 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  2. U.S. Marine Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    944 F.2d 1305 (7th Cir. 1990)   Cited 49 times

    Nos. 89-2051, 89-2140 and 89-2152. Argued December 5, 1989. Decided October 18, 1990. Reheard En Banc June 11, 1991. Decided September 25, 1991. Fred G. Groiss, Quarles Brady, Milwaukee, Wis., James D. Holzhauer (argued), Mayer, Brown Platt, Chicago, Ill., for petitioners/cross-respondents. Kenneth R. Loebel (argued), Previant, Goldberg, Uelman, Gratz, Miller Brueggeman, Milwaukee, Wis., for intervening respondent, petioner. Steven B. Goldstein, Contempt Litigation Branch, Washington, D.C., Fred

  3. Alden Leeds, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    812 F.3d 159 (D.C. Cir. 2016)   Cited 10 times

    Nos. 11–1267 11–1296. 02-05-2016 ALDEN LEEDS, INC., Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1245, Intervenor. Joseph B. Fiorenzo argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner. Jeffrey W. Burritt, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Robert J. Englehart, Supervisory Attorney

  4. Mike-Sell's Potato Chip Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    807 F.3d 318 (D.C. Cir. 2015)   Cited 4 times

    Nos. 14–1021 14–1031. 12-11-2015 MIKE–SELL'S POTATO CHIP COMPANY, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. Jennifer R. Asbrock argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs was Eric S. Clark. Micah P.S. Jost, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Richard F. Griffin, Jr., General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Elizabeth A. Heaney, Supervisory

  5. Deming Hosp. Corp.. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    665 F.3d 196 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 5 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 11–1064 11–1095. 2011-12-20 DEMING HOSPITAL CORPORATION, doing business as Mimbres Memorial Hospital, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. On Petition for Review and Cross–Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board.Kaitlin Kaseta argued the cause for petitioner. On the briefs was Bryan T. Carmody. Milakshmi V. Rajapakse, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were John H. Ferguson

  6. Scepter, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    448 F.3d 388 (D.C. Cir. 2006)   Cited 9 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Scepter, Inc. v. NLRB, 448 F.3d 388 (D.C.Cir.2006), an employer petitioned the Board to alter a remedial order that this court had enforced, arguing that modification was necessary to prevent a windfall for the charging party.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Greensburg Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

    40 F.3d 669 (3d Cir. 1994)   Cited 17 times
    Holding that company, by insisting that bargaining agreement's recognition clause did not extend to part-time employees, had not "attempt[ed] to alter the bargaining unit but rather merely advanced its interpretation of the contractual language" and noting that "interpretation of the scope of the recognition clause" could be resolved in arbitration

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Community

    483 F.3d 683 (10th Cir. 2007)   Cited 4 times   2 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 04-9605, 05-9523. April 16, 2007. Richard A. Cohen, Washington, D.C., for the Petitioner. Don T. Carmody, Brentwood, TN, for the Respondent. Before HARTZ, SEYMOUR, and McCONNELL, Circuit Judges. McCONNELL, Circuit Judge. Before us are consolidated applications brought by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce twin orders against CHS Community Health Systems, Inc. CHS argues that neither order should be enforced, because both stem from issues already litigated in a prior Board proceeding

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Cauthorne

    691 F.2d 1023 (D.C. Cir. 1982)   Cited 24 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Ongoing liability for ULP ends when parties reach agreement or good-faith impasse

  10. Porta-King Bldg. Systems v. N.L.R.B

    14 F.3d 1258 (8th Cir. 1994)   Cited 9 times
    Finding employer failed to make clear and unmistakable showing that union waived its right to bargain over layoffs