§

Midwest Generation, EME, LLC

343 N.L.R.B. 69 (N.L.R.B. 2004)
Midwest Generation, EME, LLC

16 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Brown

    380 U.S. 278 (1965)   Cited 473 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Approving finding of § 8 violation when "employers' conduct is demonstrably so destructive of employee rights and so devoid of significant service to any legitimate business end that it cannot be tolerated consistently with the Act"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc.

    494 U.S. 775 (1990)   Cited 177 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board has "considerable deference" in determining the legal rule to apply and should be upheld "as long as it is rational and consistent with the Act"

  3. American Ship Bldg. v. Labor Board

    380 U.S. 300 (1965)   Cited 350 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a lockout "for the sole purpose of bringing economic pressure to bear in support of [the employer's] legitimate bargaining position" is lawful

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 322 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

  5. Labor Board v. Truck Drivers Union

    353 U.S. 87 (1957)   Cited 197 times
    Discussing congressional debate over the Taft-Hartley amendments of 1947

  6. Local 702, I.B.E.W. v. N.L.R.B

    215 F.3d 11 (D.C. Cir. 2000)   Cited 17 times

    Nos. 99-1137, 99-1139 Argued January 19, 2000 Decided May 9, 2000 On Petitions for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Marilyn S. Teitelbaum argued the cause for the petitioners in Nos. 99-1137 and 99-1139. Stacey A. Meyers was on brief for Local 702, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, the petitioner in No. 99-1137. Cary Hammond and Greg A. Campbell were on brief for petitioner International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 148, AFL-CIO in No. 99-1139

  7. Allied Industrial Workers, AFL-CIO Local Union No. 289 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    476 F.2d 868 (D.C. Cir. 1973)   Cited 48 times
    Noting that "naked information" regarding the filing of a decertification petition without information regarding the number of signatories is insufficient to create good faith doubt of union majority status, even with additional evidence present

  8. Daily News of Los Angeles v. N.L.R.B

    73 F.3d 406 (D.C. Cir. 1996)   Cited 15 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that merit-increase program is a mandatory subject of bargaining

  9. Concepts Designs v. N.L.R.B

    101 F.3d 1243 (8th Cir. 1996)   Cited 12 times

    No. 95-3501, 95-3831. Submitted October 25, 1996. Filed December 3, 1996. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellant was Daniel R. Hols of Minneapolis, Minnesota. Counsel who presented argument on behalf of the appellee was Joseph A. Oertel of Washington, D.C. Also appearing on the brief were Charles P. Donnelly, Frederick L. Feinstein, Linda Sher, and Aileen A. Armstrong. On Petitions for Review from National Labor Relations Board. Before BOWMAN, HEANEY, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD

  10. Intern. Union of Operating Eng. v. N.L.R.B

    294 F.3d 186 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 5 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 01-1301. Argued May 16, 2002. Decided July 9, 2002. Richard F. Griffin argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Helen L. Morgan and Elizabeth A. Nadeau. John M. Singleton entered an appearance. William M. Bernstein, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Frederick Havard