§

Midland National Life Insurance Company

263 N.L.R.B. 127 (N.L.R.B. 1982)
Midland National Life Insurance Company

9 Cited authorities

  1. Securities Comm'n v. Chenery Corp.

    332 U.S. 194 (1947)   Cited 4,201 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that if the agency rests its decision on "grounds are inadequate or improper, the court is powerless to affirm the administrative action by substituting what it considers to be a more adequate or proper basis"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.

    420 U.S. 251 (1975)   Cited 434 times   64 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness

  3. Labor Board v. Tower Co.

    329 U.S. 324 (1946)   Cited 260 times
    Describing the Board's goals for its election rules and regulations

  4. Leedom v. International Bhd. of Elec. Wkrs

    278 F.2d 237 (D.C. Cir. 1960)   Cited 48 times
    Permitting independent union to intervene in decertification proceeding

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Golub Corporation

    388 F.2d 921 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 20 times
    Tracing case law background — including Virginia Electric — to the enactment of § 8(c) of the Taft-Hartley Act

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Mosey Mfg. Co., Inc.

    595 F.2d 375 (7th Cir. 1979)   Cited 6 times

    No. 78-1565. Argued January 22, 1979. Decided March 27, 1979. Linda J. Dreeben, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Leland B. Cross, Jr., Indianapolis, Ind., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before PELL, Circuit Judge, MARKEY, Chief Judge, and WOOD, Circuit Judge. The Honorable Howard T. Markey, Chief Judge of the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, is sitting by designation. MARKEY, Chief Judge. The National Labor Relations Board

  7. J. I. Case Co. v. N.L.R.B

    555 F.2d 202 (8th Cir. 1977)   Cited 4 times

    No. 76-1183. Submitted December 14, 1976. Decided May 18, 1977. George J. Matkov, Jr., Chicago, Ill., for petitioner; James J. Salzman, Kathleen K. Intini, Chicago, Ill., Thomas M. Hanna, St. Louis, Mo., on the brief. David F. Zorensky, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent; John S. Irving, Jr., Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Michael S. Winer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Midland Nat. Life Ins. Co.

    621 F.2d 901 (8th Cir. 1980)

    No. 79-1884. Submitted April 16, 1980. Decided May 7, 1980. Rehearing Denied June 26, 1980. Lafe E. Solomon, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., argued, William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., on brief, for petitioner. Steven Miller, Minneapolis, Minn., argued, Martin L. Garden, Minneapolis, Minn., on brief, for respondent. Appeal from the National

  9. Section 401 - Congressional declaration of findings, purposes, and policy

    29 U.S.C. § 401   Cited 1,044 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the LMRDA was essential to "afford necessary protection of the rights and interests of employees and the public generally as they relate to the activities of labor organizations . . ."