13 Cited authorities
U.S. v. Pierce Auto Lines
327 U.S. 515 (1946) Cited 475 timesFinding by Interstate Commerce Commission that applicant for license is financially fit must have some factual foundation on the record
Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
321 U.S. 678 (1944) Cited 269 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8
Labor Board v. Crompton Mills
337 U.S. 217 (1949) Cited 102 timesHolding unlawful unilateral changes significantly different from "any which the employer has proposed" during bargaining
Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board
185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950) Cited 162 times 2 Legal AnalysesIn Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Whitin Mach. Works
204 F.2d 883 (1st Cir. 1953) Cited 57 timesIn National Labor Relations Board v. Whitin Machine Works, 204 F.2d 883 (1st Cir.1953), for example, an assistant supervisor in his employer's accounting department was, upon a consideration of the nature of his work, determined not to be a supervisor for purposes of litigating his discharge from employment, and, therefore, he was entitled to the protections of the National Labor Relations Act. 204 F.2d at 886.
National Labor Rel. Board v. J.H. Allison Co.
165 F.2d 766 (6th Cir. 1948) Cited 44 timesNo. 10411. January 26, 1948. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by National Labor Relations Board, for enforcement of its order directing J.H. Allison Co. to cease and desist from refusing to bargain collectively concerning so-called "merit wage increases" with a labor union, as exclusive representative and bargaining agent of its production workers and to grant no merit wage increases to such employees without prior consultation with the union
N.L.R.B. v. Whitelight Prod. Div. of White M.R
298 F.2d 12 (1st Cir. 1962) Cited 11 timesNos. 5870, 5877. January 15, 1962. Melvin J. Welles, Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for National Labor Relations Board. Robert Abelow, New York City, with whom Marshall C. Berger, William J. Abelow and Weil, Gotshal Manges, New York City, were on brief, for respondent in No. 5870. Allan R. Rosenberg, Boston, Mass., for petitioner in No. 5877. Before
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. C. J. Camp, Inc.
216 F.2d 113 (5th Cir. 1954) Cited 15 timesNo. 15064. October 29, 1954. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel N.L.R.B., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel N.L.R.B., Ruth V. Reel, Arnold Ordman, Attorneys N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. E. Snow Martin, Lakeland, Fla., William F. Howe, Jerome Powell, Washington, D.C., Bryant Martin, Lakeland, Fla., Gall Lane Howe, Washington, D.C., Gall, Lane and Howe, Washington, D.C., for respondents. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and RIVES and TUTTLE, Circuit
Trumbull Asphalt Co. of Delaware v. N.L.R.B
314 F.2d 382 (7th Cir. 1963) Cited 5 timesNo. 13743. March 4, 1963. James F. Flanagan, Harold T. Halfpenny, Richard F. Hahn, Mary M. Shaw, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Judith Bleich Kahn, Atty., National Labor Relations Bd., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before HASTINGS, Chief Judge, and KNOCH and SWYGERT, Circuit Judges. HASTINGS, Chief Judge. This matter is before us on petition of Trumbull Asphalt
American Rubber Prod. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.
214 F.2d 47 (7th Cir. 1954) Cited 12 timesRelying upon Diaz