ยง

Mid-State Beverages Inc.

153 N.L.R.B. 135 (N.L.R.B. 1965)
Mid-State Beverages Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  2. Texas Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    336 F.2d 128 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 64 times
    In Texas Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 336 F.2d 128 (5 Cir. 1964), the court held that charges filed by the Union that alleged generally that the company had "engaged in * * * unfair labor practices within the meaning of" Section 8(a)(1) and (3), and then alleged specifically various acts of coercion against a named employee was sufficient to include unfair labor practices by the company against other employees which were not mentioned in the charges.

  3. Surprenant Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B

    341 F.2d 756 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 60 times
    In Surprenant Mfg. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 341 F.2d 756 (6th Cir. 1965) this Court approved as non-threatening, language of the employer which was much stronger than that used in the present case.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Stow Manufacturing Co.

    217 F.2d 900 (2d Cir. 1954)   Cited 31 times

    No. 74, Docket 23104. Argued October 6, 1954. Decided December 7, 1954. Fannie M. Boyls, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Jean Engstrom, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, for petitioner. George C. Coughlin, Harrison, Coughlin, Dermody Ingalls, Binghamton, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and L. HAND and FRANK, Circuit Judges. L. HAND,

  5. Henry L. Siegel Co. v. N.L.R.B

    328 F.2d 25 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 10 times
    In Henry L. Siegel v. NLRB, 328 F.2d 25 (2d Cir. 1964), we held that an employer violates ยง 8(a)(1) if he bludgeons his employees into furnishing copies of their statements.